Archive for November, 2010

« Older Entries | Newer Entries »

Oh. THAT’S What You Mean By “Political Convictions”

[ 1 Comment ]Posted on November 15, 2010 by admin in Politics

Monday, November 15th, 2010

Reviewing a list of American politicians convicted of crimes makes it clear that there’s ONE thing both parties can agree on.


We all know Washington’s a zoo, so it
should be pretty easy to turn it into a jail.

The other day I was talking to a liberal friend who was railing on me for not voting, saying something to the effect of “because we can’t let these criminals back in power“. This friend makes the mistake of thinking that I’m liberal mostly because I think the Bush administration was a bunch of liars and crooks. To me, this is just an observable fact. My friend got a little feisty when I suggested that Democrats were just as often guilty of crimes as Republicans, so we agreed to trust Wikipedia as a reasonably balanced source, since organizations like Judicial Watch and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington are usually run by rabid astroturfing bastards from one side or the other of the aisle who do the double civic disservice of acting like watchdogs when they’re really lapdogs. An hour later, we had come up with some rough numbers and highlights. The rough numbers? Convicted Republicans since LBJ’s White House: 80-something. Convicted Democrats: 50 something. The numbers are hard to sift through the way they’re presented, but I’d hasten to point out that Nixon and Reagan skewed the totals quite a bit, but with what were essentially only two crimes: Watergate and the Iran Contra scandal. Below are just a few highlights. See the List of American politicians convicted of crimes for yourself for hours of Wikiphilic distraction. Read the rest of this entry »

Science Friction: Why Doesn’t Sci-Fi Find A Larger Market?

[ Comments Off ]Posted on November 14, 2010 by admin in Popular Media

Sunday, November 14th, 2010

Part one of our look at why sci-fi gets such a bad rap, with a look at four worthwhile science fiction films from the last few years that you may have passed over or not even heard of.


Sunshine is just one of many great sci-fi films
that get overlooked because of marketing.

I’ve always been a little befuddled by the average person’s resistance to science fiction as a genre. I can understand why a person would be put off by the schlockier segment of this market, but every genre of fiction has a large quantity of commercial tripe from which you have to pick the better material. I would argue in fact that some of the greatest fiction of the twentieth century would typically be categorized as sci-fi: Arthur C Clarke, Robert A. Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, Ray Bradbury, and other sci-fi writers wrote some of the most insightful social-commentary-as-fiction of the era, and yet other writers, like Anthony Burgess with A Clockwork Orange and Philip K. Dick’s stories like A Scanner Darkly and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? pushed the reader to explore social and psychological realms that are crucial to a modern person’s examination of life in our rapidly-evolving information and technology-driven world. In the case of Science Fiction film, the root of the problem is obvious. It’s the Hollywood marketing mindset. Blade Runner is a classic example of a brilliant film that nearly didn’t make it to market because test audiences “didn’t get it”. While Hollywood execs are (unfortunately) probably correct in their assumption that the average viewer isn’t very bright, there’s no reason to encourage their stupidity or mental laziness by focusing all the marketing dollars on dazzling schlockbusters like Avatar or the Star Wars franchise. Films like Alien, Blade Runner, The Matrix, TV productions like Battlestar Galactica, and even sci-fi comedy like Men In Black have proven that there’s a large audience with a long market life without adhering to the traditional Hollywood approach of staying in the safety zone of films with A-List actors, dumbed-down messages like Avatar’s ecotardedness, and massive product tie-ins that – in the case of films like Star Wars – generate more than twice the revenue of the films themselves. We’ll be back in part two with a look at how comedy can ease the pain of embracing sci-fi films, but below are a few more recent films you may have overlooked. Feel free to share suggestions for our expanded list in part three. Read the rest of this entry »

The Glass Just Might Be Greener On The Other Side

[ Comments Off ]Posted on November 13, 2010 by admin in Clean & Green

Saturday, November 13th, 2010

Thanks to recent work at Los Alamos National Laboratory and Brookhaven National Laboratory, someday soon even your windows may be solar collectors.

We recently touched on a brilliant idea involving turning the world’s highways into solar collectors, but what if you could turn virtually anything into a solar collector, just by covering it with a thin transparent film? That’s just one crazy idea that may soon be possible because of recent research at the Department of Energy’s Los Alamos National Laboratory and Brookhaven National Laboratory. Working with a semiconducting polymer spiked with Fullerenes, the scientists were able to create a thin film that is effectively transparent, could efficiently generate charge and charge separation, and is scalable to industrial production levels. Existing transparent photovoltaic materials are either slightly tinted like PVGlaze architectural glass, or only partially transparent like Taiyo See-through Solar. In the latter case because the material is created with laser etching that alternates the photovoltaic material with a truly transparent material. The real innovation with the Los Alamos project lies in the fact that the material is fabricated by creating a micron-sized flow of water droplets across a thin layer of the polymer-fullerene solution, which then evaporates, leaving a nano-scale honeycomb pattern that could efficiently absorb light and facilitate electrical conductivity. A material like this could greatly enhance ideas like this Italian greenhouse project that both grows food and collects solar power. Or imagine if the material evolved to a point where it could be applied to existing buildings without significantly changing their appearance. Although there are already a lot of strategies out there for building-integrated photovoltaics , including the possibility of photovoltaic “paint”, this new technology may make even more crazy ideas possible. Imagine if you could solarize your house just buy spraying it with a transparent film…

Will Facebook E-Mail Be A G-Mail Killer? Who Cares?

[ 2 Comments ]Posted on November 12, 2010 by admin in Technology

Friday, November 12th, 2010

Why anyone would use either as their primary e-mail service escapes me. And using a Microsoft Office product through a web browser, via a Facebook account is sort of like pouring gasoline down your horse’s throat, poking his eye with a cattle prod, and yelling at it to get on the freeway

You’ve probably heard by now that Facebook will be announcing a full-fledged web e-mail service with POP access and Microsoft Office Web Apps integration on Monday. Unless – ironically – you’ve been on Facebook all day, because they themselves are saying nothing about it on the site as of this writing. So, with the tech press being as predictable as it is (apologies to Mr. Arrington, at least he breaks the stories), everyone is of course debating whether the new Facebook service is a “Google Killer”. Which is an absurdly framed question, in my opinion. Yes, Facebook and Google are in a battle to dominate the internet in various ways, but I will eat poop on the day that Facebook gets search right or Google gets social networking right. Of course everyone with a Facebook account will activate an available username@facebook.com option. And of course this will siphon in millions in ad revenue and put a big ding in Hotmail, Yahoo, and Google e-mail ad placement dollars. But will that mean that Facebook e-mail will “kill” G-Mail? I personally doubt it, for several reasons. First of all, because I know an astounding number of otherwise intelligent people who still use Hotmail or Yahoo as their primary e-mail accounts. And secondly, of the larger group of people that I know who use G-Mail – especially if they use Google Docs – the last thing in the world they’re going to do is give up the reliable functionality of Google’s cloud services to use a Microsoft Office product through a web browser, via a Facebook account. Forgive me, but in my opinion that’s like pouring gasoline down your horse’s throat, poking his eye with a cattle prod, and yelling at it to get on the freeway. But ultimately, I remain befuddled as to why people would use G-Mail or Facebook as a primary e-mail provider in the first place. Facebook is the company that helps you build a trusted network of friends and then tells you the reason you can’t export their contact info is to protect them from you. Unless THEY are giving them to another service, which then lets you export them. And Google? Aside from the fact that from day one they’ve indexed your e-mails so they can place ads next to them, they are in many ways Facebook’s strongest competitor not so much in terms of services offered, as in the realm of corporate deceipt. In their founding documents they saidwe expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers“. Two years later they introduced advertising to their results, and now derive the vast majority of their revenue from ad services. In terms of how to access e-mail, I still use a mail client and my own mail-server accounts. I guess I have the advantage of owning domains and offering reseller hosting, but this is remarkably easy to set up if you need web-based communication, and your hosting company doesn’t scour your files as a prerequisite to storing them for you. Ah well. To each their own I guess. One thing I must admit I am looking forward to though, is the first friends that get lost in FB’s interface and post an excruciatingly private e-mail on someone’s wall. You know it will be happening in the first week.

Why Can’t This Headline Contain The Word [Expletive Deleted]?

[ 2 Comments ]Posted on November 11, 2010 by admin in Editorial & Opinion

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

I thought about doing something special for the one-thousandth article on Dissociated Press, then I said f*ck it.

I noticed the other day that whatever I wrote today would be the one-thousandth thing I wrote for this site, and thought maybe I’d do something special. I pondered a few “retrospective” or “best of” notions, then I said “F*ck it. That would be pretentious“. That’s your last warning; I’m going to drop some f-bombs here. But there’s no gratuitous use of the word. It’s totally relevant to the topic at hand. So. Lately I’ve been doing a lot of work with this Chaldean guy. I know, you’re thinking “Why’s he gotta be Chaldean? Would you say that if he were white?” Well, fuck it. He IS Chaldean. Which basically means he’s “white” anyway. The thing is, he swears like a motherfucker. He has these kids, the cutest triplets in the world, and I ask him once in awhile: “Do you wash that filthy mouth before you kiss those little darlings?” He usually replies with some brief sentence in which “fuck” completely outnumbers all the other helpless little words. After about an hour with this guy, I’m cussin’ like a truck driver. Ordinarily, I don’t use the f-word a lot; in spite of its awesome power, I find it inarticulate most of the time, so I save it up. When you don’t swear with regularity, swear words seem to recharge themselves and build up this incredible force so that when you finally do blast someone with one of them, it nearly knocks them over. But I’m not really here to talk about “fuck” as word. I did that before, and half the fucking links are dead already. No, I want to talk about “fuck it” as an attitude. It had never occurred to me until I started googling the phrase and came across TheFuckItWay.com that it’s a perfect parallel to Eastern notions of spiritual detachment. The guy behind that site apparently even wrote a book called F**k It: The Ultimate Spiritual Way. In his video pitch for the book (also below), he points out that saying “fuck it” can help us achieve the state many of us are seeking without any of that tedious chanting, meditation, or eating beans. I’m not recommending the book or anything; I don’t think I need to read a whole book to understand the release from attachment one can achieve when they say “fuck it”. But it’s an awesome idea. This guy hasn’t cornered the market on this idea though; there’s Margaret Cho’s Fuck It Diet, and Amy Sedaris’ Fuck it Bucket, for instance. Anyway, I could continue rambling, but fuck it. I’m sure you’d rather watch videos, so please enjoy the ones below. Or don’t. It will have little impact on my state of being. Although I do find it mildly annoying that even though I found all these links via Google, all the AdSense content on this page will probably be the non-specific sort, because of the fact that I’m using the f-word so much. Oh well. Fuck it. Read the rest of this entry »

« Older Entries | Newer Entries »