Archive for June, 2010
« Older Entries | Newer Entries »How To Outsource Your Life
[ 1 Comment ]Posted on June 10, 2010 by admin in Lifestyle & Culture
Thursday, June 10th, 2010Why live your own life when someone overseas can do it cheaper and better?
![]() I have an evil plan to outsource myself to myself. |
Recently I was working on a project that became stalled, largely because I did a poor job of assessing the scope of the project in the first place, which led to a serious case of scope creep. I was frustrated, the investor was frustrated, and things were going nowhere. The solution? Ironically, I outsourced myself out of income by agreeing that the best solution to keep the project in motion was to hire an overseas freelancer. This leads to a condition I’m not too fond of, something the self-employed sometimes refer to as being “independently broke”. I set my own hours, have immense creative freedom, and can work from home, among other things. The only drawback? I don’t get paid. This got me joking with a friend though, about how great it would be to outsource my whole life. What if someone could call Verizon and AT&T and resolve the seemingly endless billing problems I have with them, something I’m really good at but never have the time to do? Or what if someone could meet the perfect woman for me, so I could settle down and finally be forced to get a real job? Or maybe even write articles like this for me, so I have more time to market them? Well, I was only slightly surprised that someone had done this, and with hilarious results. Check out My Outsourced Life, by Esquire’s AJ Jacobs. In a nice twist, Tim Ferriss (author of The 4-Hour Workweek) featured it on his blog, meaning he outsourced his work to an American who was outsourcing his work overseas (see the video below which explains how this trend will lead to one man in Afghanistan ending up doing 83% of the world’s work by 2025). And my little jest about outsourcing my writing? I guess we shouldn’t be surprised that 29% of bloggers surveyed by ProBlogger outsource some part of their work. This whole industry is bigger than you might think. And you don’t have to go the mainstream route of sites like Guru or RentACoder; clever people like Jon Lieb outsource themselves to their own employer. And for a mere $480 a month you can outsource your online dating. I’d avoid the advice of those millions of productivity sites though. Productivity501, for instance, offers a list of 100 personal outsourcing ideas. First of all, the list is so long and at points inane that you’ll wish you’d outsourced reviewing the list. It also seems to overlook the fact that someone who needs and can afford an assistant will be better off hiring a professional, who – one would hope – already knows how to assess which of these services you need in the first place. My favorite is the site’s suggestion that you have your assistant send handwritten letters using vLetter software. By the time you’re done tweaking the tool, you could have written a dozen letters by hand! Oh. Never mind. I guess you can outsource that too. In any case, you can rest assured we’ll be back with dozens more fascinating articles on this new work approach. As soon as we find someone to write them. Read the rest of this entry »
Live Indignation & Ticketmaster Slavery
[ Comments Off ]Posted on June 9, 2010 by admin in Music
Wednesday, June 9th, 2010It would be nice if the cost of live music were to enjoy the same market adjustment that recorded music has over the last decade, but things will probably get worse before they get better with the merger of Ticketmaster and Live Nation.
Few things have made me more ecstatic than the explosion of indy music over the past decade. But I still have one complaint. Ticket prices. While the average pop song has settled nicely at a price of about a dollar, and the artist generally takes a bigger slice of that dollar in spite of the lower unit price, concert tickets rose in price by over 80% between 1996 and 2003, and have continued to rise consistently since then. What’s behind this insane inflation of concert prices? Well, everyone’s pointing fingers, but most agree that it began over a decade ago with the aggressive and monopolistic practices of Clear Channel, who devoted most of their energy to decimating the diverse network of venues and promoters that used to exist. But as easy as it is to place ALL the blame on them, the fact is that “premium artists”, i.e.: dinosaur rock baby boomer idols like the Rolling Stones and the Eagles – are just as much to blame in many ways, by charging upwards of 300 bucks for shows, in order to offset their lousy album sales and still be able to stay in $2,000 a night hotels while on tour. Even a next generation act like Green Day can be accused of this greed, if you believe the numbers in this infographic; Green Day’s 65% cut makes the promoters and venues look like they’re being reasonable. It’s rough enough out there that even a well-established artist like Imogen Heap had to throw in the towel recently. And it’s probably going to get worse before it gets better, in light of the DOJ’s recent approval of the monster merger of Live Nation and Ticketmaster. I think it’s time we started to practice some asymmetrical warfare techniques against the concert ticketing industry. It would be amazing if a network of non-ticketmaster promoters and venues could pull it together. I personally would be out every night of the week if I could catch a decent band for ten or fifteen bucks on a regular basis. We’ve done it with record labels, lets change the game with radio and live music too.
Sure. FarmVille’s All Fun And Games. Until Somebody Makes A Billion Dollars.
[ 1 Comment ]Posted on June 8, 2010 by admin in Popular Media
Tuesday, June 8th, 2010Game sales have been outstripping music and movie sales for some time, but the real money may be in imaginary money.
If the entertainment industry is still wondering where that billion dollars in lost sales went last year, I think I have an answer for them. FarmVille. Yes, laugh at your Facebook friends as their lonely cows meander through the pasture of your Facebook feed, but Zynga, the developers of the game, banked a cool $270 million last year, and are looking forward to topping ONE BILLION DOLLARS this year. All because your do-nothing crackhead friends couldn’t find anything better to do than plant imaginary corn. But there’s the rub. It wasn’t slacker crackheads that were playing. It was Midwestern housewives. At least that’s how David Laux, global executive for games and interactive entertainment at IBM was quoted in that article. While the real demographic for the boom in this kind of game isn’t literally “Midwestern housewives”, it certainly is a new kind of user, and a new kind of development process. Not surprisingly, the same “traditional” game developers who enjoyed the kind of growth that has led to game sales outstripping movie sales in many countries are a little upset that a company like Zynga is creating the kind of revenue streams that it is, especially with the kinds of games (Farmville, Mafia Wars, etc) and user engagement strategies they utilize. Some developers resort to a bit of hyperbole to express their concern for the “purity” of the industry by saying things like “metrics-driven design and extrinsic rewards for in-game actions could lead to a future of designing shitty games that you have to pay people to play“, when what they may really mean is “dang, I wish I’d thought of that“. There’s no question that this new game market is going to be a big thing for a while, but what I find almost more interesting (and which I touched on earlier this year) is that there’s a second billion dollar industry spinning off of this all, one involving transferring your imaginary money between these booming games and social networks. I personally have never understood the “hook” with games like FarmVille; frankly Facebook itself is like a game to me. But what will catch my attention is an opportunity to get in early on a growing economy, even a virtual one. See you in ProfitsVille!
How Green Is The White House?
[ Comments Off ]Posted on June 6, 2010 by admin in Clean & Green
Sunday, June 6th, 2010The White House and Washington in general are pretty green. It’s just the policies they create that are all black and oily. And you may be surprised to learn that George Bush may have been secretly green in his spare time.
I’m sorry to say that’s classified information. But we do know that solar panels were installed in 2003 under the Bush administration, and the Obama administration is planning upgrades. President Carter is rarely given credit for his inspired attempts at opening America’s eyes to the perilous environmental future that is now the present, but he managed to open a few with this speech in 1977. He also installed solar panels on the White House which were later taken down by Ronald Reagan, in a move that was partly practical (a roof leak was being repaired), and certainly a typically Reaganesque political statement at the same time. And although the Obama administration appears firmly committed to clean & green issues, the presidential limo won’t be a hybrid, for obvious reasons. I have to admit that as I prepared to write what I intended to be a snark on Washington’s limo-driven excess and apalling waste, I was suprised to find that DC is often high up on lists of green cities. I was equally surprised to find that living in New York City is considered by some green thinkers to be a greener lifestyle choice than living in Vermont. And I’m sure that you’ll be as surprised as I was that Bush’s Crawford Ranch was pretty green too. So it seems that all in all, Washington’s pretty green. It’s just the policies created there that cause all the problems. For a lengthy and dry – but informative – history of how US foreign policy was shaped by oil over the last century, see this 1975 government report. And for a refresher on why we invaded Iraq, see this Independent UK piece. And then take a look at this list to figure out who we’ll invade next. My bet’s on Canada.
Star Trek Induced Tech Ennui
[ 2 Comments ]Posted on June 5, 2010 by admin in Technology
Saturday, June 5th, 2010Sure, I’d LOVE to boldly go where no-one has gone before. But not only do we not have the technology, that’s a split infinitive.
![]() Well, we’ve got the hardware worked out. Now we just need to work on the billing. |
I have a serious case of technology-induced ennui that I can only blame on Star Trek. Sure, iPads are nifty, and it’s really groovy that there are now affordable, terabyte-sized hard drives. Excuse me….*yawns*. I’m underwhelmed. I want some teleporation! And replicators! And a holodeck! And an android (no, not that android) friend that makes me feel more human with his/her mere existence. So, are we even getting close to Star Trek technology? Well, speaking of androids, many older cell phones look remarkably like the original Star Trek communicator, and they do essentially the same thing. Except I don’t recall anyone on Star Trek ever complaining about their horrendous monthly bill. Perhaps because they were (will be?) just as confused about economics as we are. And although we’ve teleported information (or rather, the Chinese have), it was only one bit, over ten miles. To actually transport a human, the data management requirements alone are mind-boggling. Just to store the information about the body being transported (assuming 10^28 atoms per body) would require 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 GB, or 1 Sextillion 100 Gigabyte hard drives. And then there’s the energy requirement, which (according to The Physics of Star Trek
) is a trillion degrees of heat and the equivalent energy of a 100 megaton h-bomb, all in a controlled reaction. And holodecks? Well, the recent resurgence in 3D entertainment has been fun, but as we’ve pointed out before, things haven’t changed much since the 50′s in this regard. No, we have a long way to go before most of this technology is possible. Which is too bad, because even a dozen or so replicators would go a long way toward solving the global hunger problem. Note that I’m not quibbling with the plausibilty of any of these things. Although pragmatic, hard-nosed science types expend a lot of brain power blaming the writers of Star Trek for the “flaws” in Star Trek technologies, one of the biggest offences the writers committed was the split infinitive in the introduction, i.e.: “To boldly go“. So what’s a technology-deprived person to do? Well, there’s always cryonics. I could just put myself in a deep-freeze and wait, right? Oh fudge. We don’t even have that figured out yet. Read the rest of this entry »


