<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dissociatedpress.com &#187; agency capture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissociatedpress.com/tag/agency-capture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissociatedpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 01:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is The Occupy Movement Dead?</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/02/is-the-occupy-movement-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/02/is-the-occupy-movement-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdBusters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banksters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloombergville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy ann arbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy wall st]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=3557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not likely. But it probably needs to get itself off the ropes. And though it's no longer in tents, it might still get intense. Remember: it's the banks, stupid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3558" title="rip-ows-250" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/rip-ows-250.png" alt="Is the Occupy Movement dead?" width="250" height="205" />Perhaps the only thing more tedious than a roomful of liberal intellectuals endlessly debating the world&#8217;s problems is a roomful of moderate Republicans, Tea Partiers, Libertarians, socialists, anarchists AND liberal intellectuals doing the same thing. And if you attend an Occupy-related meeting or assembly anywhere across the country, there&#8217;s a good chance that you will run into this phenomena. It&#8217;s equally likely that you will encounter a similar mix of people having a surprisingly productive and efficient meeting, using methods that will seem strange to most people. And no, I&#8217;m not talking about <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/13/finally-occupy-protester-explains-the-twinkles-hand-gesture/" target="_blank">twinkle fingers</a>; as one of the folks involved in some re-organization of <a href="http://occupyannarbor.org" target="_blank">Occupy Ann Arbor</a>, I attend a lot of meetings and events, and haven&#8217;t seen many twinkle fingers since December. No, I&#8217;m talking about consensual decision making that may borrow both from the most ancient of methods &#8211; like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agora" target="_blank">Greek Forum</a> &#8211; to cutting edge ideas like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-space_technology" target="_blank">Open Space</a>, which also is used by organizations that range from AT&amp;T and Rockport to Israeli/Palestinian peace organizers.</p>
<p>What I DO still see a lot of though is opinionating. And personal irresponsibility. And confusion. Last fall a former Ann Arborite &#8211; writing for the National Review &#8211; <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/281446/occupiers-and-accents-jay-nordlinger" target="_blank">said that</a>  &#8220;<em>an Occupy Ann Arbor is like a special ballet company, set aside for thin people</em>.&#8221; Nothing could really be farther from the truth; this town is so conservative that the real problem has been getting enough people present to actually <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>occupy</em></span> anything in a noticeable fashion. And when they <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>do</em></span> get together in any notable numbers &#8211; amongst the <a href="http://occupyannarbor.org/other-local-occupy-groups/" target="_blank">self-identified Occupy groups</a> in the area, there is a strange mix of factionalism and solidarity &#8211; there will often be a strange result. They will suddenly realize once again that they agree on a bunch of things, but then get mired in debate about what to do and how to do it. This perplexed me for months, and then I finally came to understand a few things. <span id="more-3557"></span></p>
<p>Before I go on, I have to clarify that I think the movement in general has a long tail, and that I&#8217;ve met some of the most amazing people I&#8217;ll probably ever meet in my life by participating. People I feel comfortable saying that I <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>love</em></span>. And as someone who has been expressing my frustration about things like <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/tag/bailout">banksterism</a>, <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/03/washingtons-revolving-doors-make-my-head-spin">agency capture</a>, and <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/04/brother-could-you-spare-some-fictitious-capital1/">fiat currency</a> since 2008, I am thankful to have discovered that I am not alone. Provided occupiers can remember to stay focused on paradigm-shifting innovation, the movement could truly change the world. Some really amazing hearts, minds and souls are driving things. But having said that, I can confidently say that I&#8217;ve also seen some of the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>worst</em></span> of human character in action too.</p>
<p>Although I have participated in activism in the form of NGO&#8217;s and charitable work before, it had never occurred to me that a &#8220;career&#8221; activist may possess certain other traits to accompany their sense of social justice, altruism, or sacrifice. The most frustrating to me is also one of the most subtle. There&#8217;s a good chance that if one has the mindset to decide that a lot of things are wrong with the world, they will carry this worldview into everything they do, never being happy with the process or results of the groups they work with, and always leaving meetings with a chip on their shoulder. And especially in the groups in this town, that attitude will rarely get challenged for what it is. Why? Because as I often joke, <em>it&#8217;s ironic that the elephant is the mascot of the GOP, because intellectual liberals often have the biggest elephants in the room</em>, thanks to their affected sense of respect, and paralyzing political correctness. Other traits that are natural components of a career activist&#8217;s &#8220;save the world&#8221; mentality bear a strange resemblance to religious fundamentalism, i.e.: self-righteousness, paranoia, intellectual arrogance, hypersensitivity, hero complexes, and the tendency to be a victim of what I call the &#8220;Look, a bunny! Syndrome&#8221;, i.e., getting distracted by every tiny wrong in the world and trying to fix them, and therefore never getting anything done.</p>
<p>And the larger movement? It is often confusing even to participants. Although it&#8217;s amazing that a leaderless movement with no official platform has exploded globally to include millions of people, this same lack of structure is a setup for some ironic outcomes, and a perplexing public image. Although major media sources like the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/AP5a4b9e379cc544c1b652b400fecc074a.html" target="_blank">recently reported</a>  that the Occupy Movement is planning a July 4 &#8220;caucus&#8221;, Occupy Wall Street&#8217;s PR Working Group <a href="http://press.nycga.net/2012/02/23/ows-pr-statement-on-99-declaration" target="_blank">immediately made emphatic statements</a>  that OWS doesn&#8217;t endorse the event, and essentially said that the <a href="http://www.the99declaration.org" target="_blank">99 percent Declaration Working Group</a> was not a legitimate &#8220;Occupy&#8221; group. The irony here is glaring; what they&#8217;re essentially saying is that &#8220;<em>there is no organization. Unless our organization says so</em>&#8220;. Which is an especially ironic statement, in light of the fact that <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/31/news/economy/occupy_wall_street_trademark/index.htm" target="_blank">OWS applied for a trademark </a> for the name last fall. It&#8217;s evident that OWS can&#8217;t stop people from starting pretty much anything they like, and slapping the &#8220;Occupy&#8221; label on it, including an <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/02/occupy-wall-street-now-has-super-pac/48801" target="_blank">Occupy SuperPAC</a>.</p>
<p>The Atlantic asked in a recent piece <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/02/what-if-occupy-created-movement-so-big-it-couldnt-control-it/49102" target="_blank">What if Occupy Created a Movement so Big it Couldn&#8217;t Control it</a>?  Well, I think &#8220;they&#8221; already did. The word &#8220;occupy&#8221; is so easily adapted to different contexts that it&#8217;s impossible to control its propagation. This was partly calculated, and partly accident. Although Adbusters is often credited with &#8220;creating&#8221; the movement, their call to &#8220;Occupy Wall Street&#8221; was just one of many such calls to action, many of which have had zero impact. Remember the <a href="http://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbusters-blog/what-carnivalesque-rebellion.html" target="_blank">Carnivalesque Rebellion</a>? I didn&#8217;t think so. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buy_Nothing_Day" target="_blank">Buy Nothing Day</a>? Maybe, but that never seemed to have an impact on retail sales. Adbusters&#8217; Kalle Lasn may have hit the mark with the branding this time, but he was well aware of the Arab Spring and the pre-OWS <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/in-bloombergville-budget-protesters-sleep-in/" target="_blank">Bloombergville</a>, and merely managed to &#8220;nail the brand&#8221; of something that was about to explode anyway. And will continue exploding.</p>
<p>Because you know what? The world IS kind of screwed up, and most of the problems are caused by a centuries-old economic paradigm that &#8211; although it keeps a precious few powerful and self-satisfied &#8211; is doomed. Their wealth and power relies entirely on a social contract with the rest of us, and they know it. And they have broken that contract. And regardless of how you break down the percentages, there are a LOT more of &#8220;us&#8221; than &#8220;them&#8221;.</p>
<p>Think the &#8220;Occupy Movement&#8221; is a joke? We&#8217;ll see you in June! Unless US gas prices hit five bucks even sooner than expected. Those who have hesitated to get seriously involved so far are probably sensible; life in the states is actually pretty easy, frankly. But things might feel a little different if those who are already just &#8220;tightening up&#8221; suddenly find they can&#8217;t keep up with their cable and mobile bills AND eat.</p>
<p>TV and pizza. It&#8217;s the new Bread &amp; Circuses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/02/is-the-occupy-movement-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seven BEGINNING Of The World Ideas For 2012</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/01/seven-beginning-of-the-world-ideas-for-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/01/seven-beginning-of-the-world-ideas-for-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy wall st]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=3514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we're all expecting the end of the world as we know it, we might as well plan the new one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/beginning-of-the-world-2012-250.jpg" alt="Is 2012 the end of the world?" title="beginning-of-the-world-2012-250" width="250" height="219" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 5px 10px;" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3515" />Okay, we&#8217;ve all had our fun pondering the end of life as we know it this year. I even took <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/12/end-of-the-world-2012-now-with-13-alternate-endings/">a humorous stab at it</a> just the other day. I guess we needed to get it out of our systems again. I mean, it&#8217;s been over ten long years since the <em>last</em> time we got all nutty about the impending apocalypse. Personally, I&#8217;m of the opinion that this yearning for a dramatic end of the world scenario is driven largely by the collective unconscious guilt of the human race. On the one hand, the guilt that wealthy elites unconsciously feel, knowing that the tablet device their ten year old is watching Disney movies on as they fly to a tropical retreat was made by the cracked and bleeding fingers of ANOTHER ten year old, half a world away. A ten year old that gets paid a dollar a day so that the company that made the tablet can &#8220;retain the talent&#8221; of the overpaid CEO that was largely responsible for taking that dollar-a-day kid&#8217;s crappy job away from some former middle class American because they got paid 20 times more for it. And on the OTHER hand, the collective guilt fueled by the laziness and apathy of that same former middle-class American, who didn&#8217;t vote, didn&#8217;t pay attention while their country got gutted by robber barons, and instead sat around ordering out for pizza and watching &#8220;reality TV&#8221; and cable news while their home got repossessed and the cost of education skyrocketed so high that their kids will be doomed to the same second-rate first-world life that they are. Do I sound cynical? I&#8217;m not. In fact, I figure if we DO finally have to face the end of the world this year, that just means we have opportunities to create a new one. And the ball is already in motion. From the recent massive protests in Russia, to the Occupy, Tea Party, and &#8220;think local&#8221; movements in America, to the &#8220;Arab Spring&#8221;, regular people all over the world are demanding a better world. I think we can make one. How about you? Below is my starter wish list. Feel free to chime in or tell me what an idiotic Utopian I am. <span id="more-3514"></span></p>
<h2>Take Back Our Government</h2>
<p><br/ ><br />
Get lobby money and corporate influence out of the political process.</p>
<p>Repeal corporate personhood. Or start executing corporations for their crimes.</p>
<p>End &#8220;agency capture&#8221; and the revolving door practices of DC. Stop appointing former executives to regulate the industries that used to employ them.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t just vote in &#8220;big&#8221; elections, get involved in the full process.</p>
<h2>Put People To Work</h2>
<p><br/ ><br />
Transform welfare handout programs into infrastructure-building work programs</p>
<p>Stop shipping jobs overseas to maximize profits. Cut CEO salaries instead.</p>
<h2>Revamp The Prison System</h2>
<p><br/ ><br />
America&#8217;s prison system is a racially-biased*, multibillion dollar industry that is probably better at training new criminals than anything else. If America wants to continue being the largest consumer of recreational drugs on the planet, maybe those drugs should be legalized and taxed.</p>
<p>Over 2 million Americans are in jail right now, and over 7 million are under correctional supervision. Over 50% are incarcerated for non-violent offenses, and 20% are incarcerated for drug offenses.</p>
<p>America in fact leads the world in incarceration, with Rwanda and Russia trailing in second and third. For comparison, the next western democracy on the list is the United Kingdom, with 1/5 America&#8217;s incarceration rate, sitting at 89th on the list worldwide.  America has twice the incarceration rate of countries we might think of as oppressive, like Belarus, Ukraine, Iran, and Kazakhstan.</p>
<p>Put some white men in prison. The collateral economic damage caused by a dozen or so of the mostly white, mostly male criminals in the financial services sector easily dwarfs the economic repercussions of crimes committed by a million of the existing inmates in the correctional system, who probably cost us more as prisoners than as active criminals.</p>
<h2>Feed Some People</h2>
<p><br/ ><br />
Americans waste about 34 million tons tons of food each year. This is about 14-15 per cent of the food they purchase, amounting to $43 billion worth of discarded, but edible, food. We spend 1 billion dollars a year just to DISPOSE of this waste. Why are people dying of starvation in 2012?</p>
<h2>Mind Your Own Business (Unless You&#8217;re Helping)</h2>
<p><br/ ><br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Abroad</span> -</p>
<p>The heroic image of America saving the world in the 1940&#8242;s is 70 years old, and coming off a bit contrived these days.</p>
<p>Maybe we could rebuild America&#8217;s positive image abroad by only getting involved when asked.</p>
<p>Last time I checked, no-one was asking to be bombed, but plenty of people still wanted an iPad and a Hollywood film.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">At Home</span>-</p>
<p>Restore the civil liberties that have been stripped from citizens in the guise of protecting them.</p>
<p>Put an end to the &#8220;security theater&#8221; that has nearly destroyed the travel industry and makes travel a miserable personal experience.</p>
<p>Let the Patriot Act &#8220;sunset&#8221; as originally promised, and get AT&amp;T out of our personal communications.</p>
<h2>Stop Torturing People</h2>
<p><br/ ><br />
Remember when we WEREN&#8217;T the bad guys?</p>
<h2>Shoot For The Stars</h2>
<p><br/ ><br />
One of the greatest eras in the history of mankind was largely driven by space exploration.</p>
<p>Magellan, Marco Polo, Columbus, and other brave explorers in history were in it for more than the money.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a strange logical fallacy going on when it&#8217;s considered sensible to spend a trillion dollars on killing people, but frivolous to send explorers to learn more about the solar system we live in.</p>
<p><span class="bodytextsm"> *About 7% of the general population is African American, but African Americans comprise almost half of the total prison population</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/01/seven-beginning-of-the-world-ideas-for-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confused By All The Google/Verizon Network Neutrality Talk?</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/08/confused-by-all-the-googleverizon-network-neutrality-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/08/confused-by-all-the-googleverizon-network-neutrality-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=2370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't be. It's simple. What Google and Verizon are trying to do is comparable to Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone supporting free and open competition of horseless carriages while guaranteeing themselves protected monopolies to make cars.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left; border: 0pt none; margin: 5px 10px;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/verizon-google-futile-220.png" alt="" width="220" height="204" />Confused by all the talk from Google and Verizon about their plans for protecting net neutrality? Don&#8217;t be. All the jargon, press releases, and proposals thrown around by both companies are classic strategies. Confuse the public with a flurry of conflicting hints, public statements and denials while <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2010/8/9/who-gets-priority-on-the-web/regulators-make-matters-worse" target="_blank">doing your best to control the actions of the agency that might regulate you</a>. The nutshell version of what these two companies are trying to do with the internet and wireless broadband access could be likened to Henry Ford and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Firestone" target="_blank">Harvey Firestone</a> supporting free and open competition of horseless carriages while giving themselves protected monopolies of the yet-to-be defined automobile market. It&#8217;s dirty. But would you expect anything else from either company during economic times like this? And don&#8217;t get me going on the Google &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; thing. We joked back in 2008 that <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/09/top-to-bottom-googles-got-you-covered" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s got you covered top to bottom</a> . And the irony of the words you&#8217;re about to read being surrounded by Google ads is not lost on me. But here&#8217;s the scary truth: if Facebook&#8217;s <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebook-timeline" target="_blank">deceiptful privacy practices</a> and attitude have caused you to be angry or concerned, Google&#8217;s attitude should trouble you exponentially more. Most recently, Google&#8217;s Eric Schmidt was <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_ceo_schmidt_people_arent_ready_for_the_tech.php" target="_blank">quoted in this article</a> as saying (in reference to the massive amounts of data compiled about you) that &#8220;<em>The only way to manage this is true transparency and no anonymity. In a world of asynchronous threats, it is too dangerous for there not to be some way to identify you. We need a verified name service for people. <strong>Governments will demand it </strong></em>&#8221; (emphasis mine). This is in line with his <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12/google-ceo-eric-schmidt-dismisses-privacy" target="_blank">December 2009 remark</a> that &#8220;<em>If you have something that you don&#8217;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place</em>.&#8221; Which may be true. But do you want a company like Google or Verizon to be the ones making these decisions? If this cavalier attitude doesn&#8217;t trouble you, and if &#8211; like many people &#8211; you have a Gmail account and use any of Google&#8217;s many free tools, try the following, if you haven&#8217;t already. Go to your <a href="http://www.google.com/dashboard" target="_blank">Google Dashboard</a> and see what they&#8217;ve been tracking. If you&#8217;re a light user of Gmail who just logs in and out to check mail, you&#8217;ll see little of interest here. But if you stay logged into your Google accounts all the time, you might be a little disturbed by how much information about you is compiled in one place. And now Google not only wants to know what you HAVE done, they think they can predict <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/schmidt-we-can-predict-where-you-are-going-to-go-708339" target="_blank">what you WILL do</a>. By the way, if they&#8217;re so good at predicting the future, this begs the question: how did they not know that Facebook would kick their ass so bad on social networking? <span id="more-2370"></span></p>
<p><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/verizon-google-futile-500.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/08/confused-by-all-the-googleverizon-network-neutrality-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Film Industry Is Only FCCing Itself With New Regulations</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/05/film-industry-is-only-fccing-itself-with-new-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/05/film-industry-is-only-fccing-itself-with-new-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyfight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=2124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the film industry's latest victory in its battle to control how you watch your movies may actually contribute to its demise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left; border: 0pt none; margin: 5px 10px;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/fcc-mpaa-regulatory-capture.gif" alt="" width="251" height="228" />It is with mixed feelings that I bid adieu to the MPAA and the major motion picture companies of America, because although some of the epic films that came out of&#8230;.oh hell. Who am I kidding. I&#8217;m already planning a party. The desperate land grab for your hard-earned CD&#8217;s and song files that the RIAA and the established music industry attempted with the Digital Millenium Copyright Act and DRM has spawned one of the most creative decades in pop music, and put more money in more artists&#8217; pockets than ever before. Although smart pop media influencers like Cory Doctorow of Boing Boing are <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/05/07/fcc-hands-hollywood.html" target="_blank">in a tizzy</a> about the admittedly insane new &#8220;Selectable Output Control&#8221; power that the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31322_3-20004504-256.html" target="_blank">FCC is handing the film industry</a>, the development should come as no surprise; I can only guess that the reason Cory is so upset is that he must be a cable subscriber. As an avid film lover, this will have little impact for me personally. As just one of the more glaring examples of <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>why</em></span> this should come as no surprise, one of the people who more recently spun through <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/03/washingtons-revolving-doors-make-my-head-spin">DC&#8217;s revolving doors</a> was Catherine Bohigian, chief of the office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis at the FCC, who <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080831/0618342133.shtml" target="_blank">left in 2008 to take a job with the cable giant Cablevision</a>. To me the most shocking thing about this recent round of nuttiness being promulgated by the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2010/04/08/meet-joan-graves-the-head-of-the-mpaa" target="_blank">in-some-ways shadowy MPAA</a> is that it&#8217;s taking so darn long for the movie industry to undermine itself the way the music industry did. It shouldn&#8217;t take <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>too</em></span> long though; although the studios haven&#8217;t been aggressively <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/06/support-corporate-fascism-buy-a-cd/">suing their customers on a regular basis</a> like the record companies, they <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>do</em></span> have a pretty <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/entertainment-industrys-dystopia-future" target="_blank">batshit-insane shopping list for how to protect their market</a>. And  after witnessing the indy music industry explosion of the last decade, I personally don&#8217;t see any reason why this couldn&#8217;t happen with film. The film industry is doing exactly the same thing the record companies did; they&#8217;re routinely annoying their best customers, and sticking it to a key distribution channel in their maniacal grab for control of intellectual property. The RIAA did it with radio, the MPAA is <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2010/05/10/coming-to-your-tv-new-movies-still-in-the-theater/" target="_blank">doing it to theaters</a>. And they&#8217;re doing this at a time when professional-quality production and distibution tools are within the reach of just about anyone. In my opinion there would be nothing cooler than a massive movement comprised of small-house indy film venues showing nothing but indy film in intimate settings using HD technology. I say go ahead and FCC yourself, MPAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/05/film-industry-is-only-fccing-itself-with-new-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington&#8217;s Revolving Doors Make My Head Spin</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/03/washingtons-revolving-doors-make-my-head-spin/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/03/washingtons-revolving-doors-make-my-head-spin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military industrial complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monsanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolving door]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=1935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The corporate takeover of the US Government is not tin-foil hat stuff, it's well documented. We just don't pay any attention. But will we ever DO anything about it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/revolving-door.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="183" /><br />
<span class="bodytextsm">This attractive revolving door is made<br />
by the <a class="bodytextsmlink" href="http://www.dorma-usa.com" target="_blank">Crane Door</a> company. We didn&#8217;t<br />
research them for influence peddling.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I like to think of myself as a little more informed than the &#8220;average&#8221; citizen &#8211; whoever they are &#8211; yet I regularly find myself to be disturbingly naive (okay, just plain <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>stupid</em></span>) regarding how things really work in our government. It has bothered me for some time that our government seems to have been <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/03/false-profits-of-the-econopocalypse/">taken over by the finance industry</a>, and that it <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/06/the-presidents-analyst-eerily-predicts-atts-omnipotence">operates in creepy collusion with a telecom monopoly</a>, but until taking a closer look recently, I had no idea how active that revolving door in Washington really was. Considered &#8220;business as usual&#8221; by most Washington insiders, it even has a polite euphemism. Instead of calling it a corporate coup of our government, it&#8217;s called <a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/Agency_capture" target="_blank">Agency Capture</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture" target="_blank">Regulatory Capture</a>. I believe in the old school Republican idea that government can be bad for business, but I can hardly accept the reverse, i.e.: that business is good for government. I think the <a href="http://www.prwatch.org/node/8813" target="_blank">recent banking catastrophes</a> and <a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/investigations/broken_government/articles/entry/1044" target="_blank">USDA food safety failures</a> speak for themselves; with the former you have the revolving banking industry/treasury department door, with the latter, the USDA/Monsanto door. I would be astounded if the current administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ExecutiveOrder-EthicsCommitments" target="_blank">plans to make changes</a> in revolving door policies were successful; the practice is simply far too pervasive. The amount of information on government agencies that are staffed with former corporate influence peddlers is overwhelming. Eisenhower <a href="http://www.h-net.org/~hst306/documents/indust.html" target="_blank">warned of us the Military Industrial Complex</a> back in 1961, and Monsanto has been a target of this scrutiny for some time; see lists like <a href="http://www.mindfully.org/GE/Revolving-Door.htm" target="_blank">this one</a> or <a href="http://www.edmonds-institute.org/olddoor.html" target="_blank">this one</a>. But these are just high-profile, extremely well-funded examples. This form of governing reaches across every industry, and at all levels of government. I&#8217;ve compiled a table of examples below, but for a really amazing resource, check out <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving" target="_blank">Open Secrets&#8217; Revolving Door</a> database. You can use it to do things like starting with <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/top.php?display=Z" target="_blank">a list of over 300 former public servants</a> to track their connections, or look at revolving door employees <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/top.php?display=G" target="_blank">by agency</a>. The White House has nearly 500 on staff itself. In spite of the overwhelming number of federal employees that are infecting the way our government runs, there <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>is</em></span> a bright side. Rather than feeling paranoid and powerless against cold, inhuman, and faceless corporations, we COULD start targeting the actual people responsible with civic action. They only get away with it because we don&#8217;t pay attention. The tables and images below begin to give it all a face. <span id="more-1935"></span></p>
<table class="bodytext" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3" bgcolor="#999999">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #ffffff;"><span class="style1"><strong>NAME</strong></span></span></td>
<td><span style="color: #ffffff;"><span class="style1"><strong>GOVERNMENT JOB(S)</strong></span></span></td>
<td><span style="color: #ffffff;"><span class="style1"><strong>INDUSTRY JOBS/CLIENTS</strong></span></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Randall L. Tobias</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">White House &#8211; Global AIDS Coordinator</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Eli Lilly</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Linda<br />
Fisher</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Head of government affairs<br />
for Monsanto</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Deputy administrator of<br />
Environmental Protection Agency</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">J. Steven Grile</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Coal and oil company executive and lobbyist for the<br />
mining industry</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Deputy Interior Secretary</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">William Geary Myers III</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Lobbyist for the National Cattlemen&#8217;s Beef Association</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Chief lawyer for the Interior Department</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Dan Glickman</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Akin, Gump, Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld, major  DC lobbying/law firm</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Head of USDA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Michael A. Friedman</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Senior VP at G. D. Searle &amp; Co., a pharmaceutical<br />
division of Monsanto</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">FDA<br />
Department of Health and Human Services</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Clayton K. Yeutter</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Board of directors of Dow Chemical&#8217;s Mycogen Corporation</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Head of USDA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Michael Friedman</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Food and Drug Administration,<br />
Acting Commissioner</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">PhRMA, Pharmacia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Donald Rumsfield</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Secretary of Defense</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Gilead,, G. D. Searle</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Deborah Steelman</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">White House Budget Director</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Eli Lilly, Steelman Health Industries, Aetna, American Home Products, Bristol Myers Squib,<br />
Humana, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, PhRMA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Mitchell Daniels Jr.</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Director, Office of Management and Budget</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Eli Lilly</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Gerald J. Mossinghoff</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Assistant Secretary of Commerce, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier &amp; Neustadt, .PhRMA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Donald C. Alexander</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Department of the<br />
Interior</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer &amp; Feld, L.L.P., Johnson &amp; Johnson</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Edward J. Allera</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">FDA</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer &amp; Feld, L.L.P., Johnson &amp; Johnson</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Barney J. Skladany, Jr.</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Department of Justice</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer &amp; Feld, L.L.P., Johnson &amp; Johnson, Warner-Lambert</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Thaddeus J. Burns</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">United States Patent &amp; Trademark Office, U.S. Intellectual Property Attaché-USTR, Geneva</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer &amp; Feld, L.L.P,</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Peter Barton Hutt</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Chief Counsel-FDA</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Covington &amp; Burling, PhRMA, Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers Association</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Bruce N. Kuhlik</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Department of Justice</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Covington &amp; Burling, Merck, PhRMA, and Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers Association</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Jeanne S. Archibald</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">General Counsel-Department of Treasury, USTR</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Hogan &amp; Hartson, L.L.P., PhRMA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Michael R Pollard</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Federal Trade Commission</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Michaels &amp; Bonner, P.C, Merck</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Jack W. Martin</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">FDA</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Parry and Romani Associates, Abbott, American Home Products, Bristol- Myers<br />
Squibb, Glaxo-Wellcome, Hoechst Marion Roussel, ICN Pharmaceuticals,<br />
Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Metagenics, Monsanto, Pfizer,<br />
Pharmacia &amp; Upjohn, Schering-Plough, and SmithKline Beecham</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Linda A. Skladany</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">OSHA, Department<br />
of Transportation, Department of Education</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Parry and Romani Associates, Abbott, American Home Products, Bristol- Myers<br />
Squibb, Glaxo-Wellcome, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Metagenics, Monsanto, Pfizer, Pharmacia<br />
&amp; Upjohn, Schering-Plough, and SmithKline Beecham</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Lee Skillington</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">United States Patent &amp; Trademark Office</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Powell, Goldstein, Frazer, &amp; Murphy LLP, PhRMA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Jeffrey Kushan</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">United States Patent &amp; Trademark Office, USTR</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Powell, Goldstein, Frazer, &amp; Murphy LLP, Merck</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/03/washingtons-revolving-doors-make-my-head-spin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
