<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dissociatedpress.com &#187; lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissociatedpress.com/tag/lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissociatedpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 01:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Suing Its Only Friends?</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/07/gop-suing-its-only-friends/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/07/gop-suing-its-only-friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafe press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP threatens Cafe Press with lawsuits for letting its users promote the GOP.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 10px 15px; float: left;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/gop_piracy.gif" alt="GOP: Good Old-fashioned Piracy" width="117" height="186" /></p>
<p>Hey Republicans! You&#8217;re doing it wrong! In the latest example of &#8220;just-not-getting-it&#8221;, the GOP is apparently <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/gop-threatening.html" target="_blank">threatening to sue CafePress</a> for allowing its users to repurpose the various trademarked GOP images such as the red-white-and-blue elephant and the letters &#8220;GOP&#8221;. The irony, of course, being the preponderance of images that are IN FAVOR of the GOP. Why would you want to sue your free marketing team? They obviously don&#8217;t have any money, I mean, who buys anything from CafePress? Next thing you know, they&#8217;ll be suing kids for drawing pictures of Dumbo and reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FHorton-Hears-Who-Pop-up-Seuss%2Fdp%2F0375841946%2F&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325" target="_blank">Horton Hears a Who</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />. Get a grip, GOP, your existing internal marketing people don&#8217;t seem to be doing you any favors, and getting lawyers involved isn&#8217;t likely to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/07/gop-suing-its-only-friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FISA: A Big Barack Obummer</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/07/barack-obummer/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/07/barack-obummer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retroactive immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrantless wiretapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much deceipt will Democratic voters accept in the name of winning?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 10px 15px; float: left;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/obama_flip.gif" alt="" width="159" height="145" />The passage of the FISA bill in congress last week reminded me of how glad I am that I&#8217;m usually able to maintain my ignorant dreams of utopia. This ability comes in handy at times like these, when a politician I thought I really admired so whole-heartedly caves in and signs off on what I consider to be one of the most un-American pieces of legislation to slither through the gutter that is the U.S. Congress. Hey, B.O.! You really let us down on this one! It was only October last year that Obama&#8217;s spokesperson <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/10/obama_camp_says_it_hell_support_filibuster_of_any_bill_containing_telecom_immunity.php " target="_blank">Bill Burton  said</a> <em>&#8220;To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies&#8221;</em> . October Surprise, indeed. If you want to learn more about the FISA bill, Glenn Greenwald had an <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/07/09/fisa_vote/index.html" target="_blank">informative piece on Salon</a>, and here&#8217;s the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act" target="_blank">Wikipedia entry</a>. If you want to take action, you can <a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/faachallenge.html" target="_blank">support the ACLU</a>, which has filed a lawsuit questioning the bill&#8217;s constitutionality, or support the EFF, with their <a href="https://secure.eff.org/site/Donation?ACTION=SHOW_DONATION_OPTIONS&amp;CAMPAIGN_ID=1741" target="_blank">Continue the Fight Against Warrantless Wiretapping</a> campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/07/barack-obummer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record Industry Begs World: &#8220;Please Stop Buying Music!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/06/record-industry-begs-world-please-stop-buying-music/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/06/record-industry-begs-world-please-stop-buying-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flow chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does the recording industry want radio stations to stop playing music?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bbspot.com/News/2007/03/riaa-lawsuit-matrix.html" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" style=" border: 0pt none ; margin: 10px 15px; float: left;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/riaa-lawsuit-matrix-link.jpg" alt="" width="139" height="180" /></a>In the ongoing saga of the RIAA just not getting it, they are apparently tired of suing <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2006/02/03/riaa-claims-computerless-woman-was-a-pirate" target="_blank">old ladies who don&#8217;t even have computers </a> and <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/05/riaa_sues_the_dead/" target="_blank">dead people</a> and are now trying to kill their oldest and most reliable channel of cheap promotion, radio. Although the recording industry historically was quite happy to pay the broadcasting industry to play music (illegally, in fact &#8211; it was called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola" target="_blank">payola</a>), they now seem to think it should be the <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/06/recording-indus.html" target="_blank">other way around</a>. Click on the image at left for a detailed <a href="http://www.bbspot.com/News/2007/03/riaa-lawsuit-matrix.html" target="_blank">flow chart </a> of how the RIAA decides whom to sue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/06/record-industry-begs-world-please-stop-buying-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
