<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dissociatedpress.com &#187; Dick Cheney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissociatedpress.com/tag/dick-cheney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissociatedpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 01:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s Play Dunk The Dick</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/02/lets-play-dunk-the-dick/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/02/lets-play-dunk-the-dick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Dick Cheney loves waterboarding so much, I think he should subject himself to it on Sunday TV.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dick-cheney-waterboarding.jpg" alt="" width="185" height="257" /><br />
<span class="bodytextsm">Dick Cheney LOVES<br />
him some waterboardin&#8217;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m alone in saying that I wish Dick Cheney would just shut up. It&#8217;s not because I have some airy-fairy liberal stance that as a former vice president, <a href="http://themoderatevoice.com/54824/cheney-blasts-obama-on-afghanistan-before-speech-accuses-obama-of-giving-aid-and-comfort-to-the-enemy" target="_blank">protocol dictates that he shouldn&#8217;t speak in ways</a> that undermine a sitting president&#8217;s actions; <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2233450" target="_blank">this Slate piece</a> does a nice roundup of <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>other</em></span> former executive branch members who couldn&#8217;t keep their mouths shut either, and frankly, one of the worst in this regard was former democratic president Jimmy Carter. No, for me it&#8217;s a few other things. One is that I just get sick of seeing that hideous little face of his. Another is that I get sick of hearing about him when he makes some childish and angry remark on Sunday TV, and that&#8217;s all my liberal friends talk about for a week. But perhaps most importantly, it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m sick of a self-serving, sociopathic, sadistic prick trying to take on the mantle of dignified statesman, and getting airtime to do it. It would be a lot easier to tolerate statements like <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/02/cheney-i-was-a-big-supporter-of-waterboarding.html" target="_blank">&#8220;I was a big supporter of waterboarding&#8221;</a> if I knew he had at least tried it once. A different self-serving prick who gets on my nerves <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808" target="_blank">tried it</a>, and although I&#8217;ll continue to disagree with lots of other things he says, I won&#8217;t take issue with his stance on <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>that</em></span> topic. So please Dick, do us a favor. You&#8217;ve already carved out your legacy with a <a href="http://www.dickipedia.org/dick.php?title=Dick_Cheney" target="_blank">Dickipedia entry</a> and a place on Time&#8217;s <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1834600_1834604_1834587,00.html" target="_blank">Worst Vice Presidents</a> list. Please, just shut up and get back to your other hobbies like <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3977702" target="_blank">running corporations that support rape </a> and <a href="http://writechic.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/dick-cheney-shoots-a-78-year-old-man-in-the-face-day-2" target="_blank">shooting your friends in the face</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/02/lets-play-dunk-the-dick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m Proclaiming Myself Emperor Of The Known Universe</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/11/why-im-proclaiming-myself-emperor-of-the-known-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/11/why-im-proclaiming-myself-emperor-of-the-known-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lamb chop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate President of Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretesident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shari lewis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DEMOCRACY is just an acronym for Deliberate Entitled Manipulation Of Citizens' Right to Accurately Counted Yearnings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 5px 10px; float: left;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/emperor-cheney.jpg" alt="" width="245" height="184" />I&#8217;d like to propose a new word and a new acronym for use in politics. The word is &#8220;pretesident&#8221;. In the states, we&#8217;re all familiar with that guy who became president for two consecutive terms by actually <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>losing</em></span> the elections, and who, once in office, had the nerve to not even be in charge, but instead <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/bush-puppet" target="_blank">&#8220;played Lamb Chop&#8221; to his advisors&#8217; Shari Lewis</a>. What we haven&#8217;t heard much about are a few other pretesidents around the world. Recently, one took office in Afghanistan without much uproar, in spite of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/18/afghanistan-election-fraud-evidence" target="_blank">rather clear evidence that the election was rigged</a>. A little ironic, because he was chosen by <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>our</em></span> former puppet to uphold democracy and replace the Taliban. In Mexico, we have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9s_Manuel_L%C3%B3pez_Obrador#.22Legitimate_Presidency.22" target="_blank">The Legitimate President of Mexico</a>. He&#8217;s not actually the legitimate president of Mexico, he&#8217;s just another guy who lost what was probably another rigged election, but has the nerve to run around saying &#8220;<em>I&#8217;m The Legitimate President of Mexico</em>&#8220;. For a little more depth, see this <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125797784763244141.html " target="_blank">Wall Street Journal piece</a>. And soon, we&#8217;ll have the President of the European Union. There have been rumors that it&#8217;ll be that Bush administration butt-lick Tony Blair, and those ballsy EuroLeaders not only <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1940255,00.html" target="_blank">aren&#8217;t letting the people vote on it</a>, they&#8217;re <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/europeans-meet-secretly-to-choose-first-ever-eu-president/2/" target="_blank">not even telling how they make the selection</a>. With all these &#8220;pretesidents&#8221; running around, I&#8217;m surprised <a href="http://www.dickipedia.org/dick.php?title=Dick_Cheney" target="_blank">ol&#8217; Dick</a> hasn&#8217;t claimed the title of Emperor or something. I mean, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/opinion/19dowd.html?_r=3" target="_blank">George Lucas already gave it to him</a>, he might as well take it and run with it. Which brings me at last to the acronym I referred to earlier. It&#8217;s D.E.M.O.C.R.A.C.Y., and it stands for &#8220;Deliberate Entitled Manipulation Of Citizens&#8217; Right to Accurately Counted Yearnings&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/11/why-im-proclaiming-myself-emperor-of-the-known-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brewing Discontent: Since When Is The GOP Anti-Deficit?</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/04/brewing-discontent-since-when-is-the-gop-anti-deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/04/brewing-discontent-since-when-is-the-gop-anti-deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Prosperity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teabagging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While liberals kick back with their lemon-grass tea, conservatives brew theirs with Astroturf...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="212" height="172" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8i-OWDjOQfI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="212" height="172" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8i-OWDjOQfI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I shouldn&#8217;t be as astounded as I am that the GOP has once again taken ownership of a public sentiment that has absolutely no real foundation in a partisan stance. Tell me. Who in America (besides a bunch of bailed out bank executives) is NOT angry that tax dollars are being funneled into a mind-boggling array of government subsidizing of business and bailouts of epic business failures? And more importantly, how the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>hell</em></span> did the GOP spin this out so cleverly and so quickly into <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>their</em></span> issue, when it is, plain and simple, their <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>fault</em></span>? This is the party that from <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A26402-2004Jun8?language=printer" target="_blank">Reagan</a> to <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/2004/Dick_Cheney_Budget_+_Economy.htm" target="_blank">Cheney</a> has said that deficits don&#8217;t matter. And now, suddenly, deficits are a <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b18c6d16-291c-11de-bc5e-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">horrible monster created by Barack Obama</a>. The GOP is even benefitting from the humor and confusion that a typical witty liberal will enjoy when watching a pun-laden rant <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>against</em></span> tea parties, as in the MSNBC clip featured at left. Who&#8217;s behind this masterpiece of Astroturfing? Mostly the conservative lobby groups <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/04/09/lobbyists-planning-teaparties" target="_blank">Freedom Works and Americans for Prosperity</a>. Nice job, Dems. <span id="more-879"></span></p>
<p><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/astroturf-tea.jpg" alt="" width="327" height="442" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/04/brewing-discontent-since-when-is-the-gop-anti-deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It All Comes Out In The End&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/12/it-all-comes-out-in-the-end/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/12/it-all-comes-out-in-the-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constipation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...at least Dick Cheney hope so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/strip13.gif" alt="" width="450" height="200" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/12/it-all-comes-out-in-the-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Bought The Farm, Now He&#8217;s Selling The Ranch</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/12/we-bought-the-farm-now-hes-selling-the-ranch/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/12/we-bought-the-farm-now-hes-selling-the-ranch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 05:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crawford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impeach Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karl rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turd Blossom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Kinder, Snugglier Legacy For George Bush?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/kinder-snugglier-bush.jpg" alt="" width="153" height="185" /><span class="bodytextsm"><br />
A Kinder, Snugglier Legacy?</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad George Bush <a href="http://www.thebostonchannel.com/helenthomas/2547076/detail.html" target="_blank">didn&#8217;t like reading the newspaper</a> as president. If he had, he might have realized what a <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history" target="_blank">horrible person</a> he&#8217;d been much sooner, and wouldn&#8217;t be <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=15&amp;entry_id=27226" target="_blank">apologizing for it now</a>. Not that he didn&#8217;t have plenty of help from his <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/12/the-right-to-di.html" target="_blank">Constitution-shredding &#8220;co-president&#8221;</a> , and the revolting gasbag he affectionately refers to as <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/keillor/2007/08/15/rove" target="_blank">Turd Blossom</a>. So he&#8217;s selling the infamous <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/08/counting-down-till-bush-sells-the-ranch.html" target="_blank">Rancho De Relaciones Públicas</a> and moving back to his <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/172135" target="_blank">native suburban environment</a>, which apparently <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/presidentbush/2008/07/its-official-bu.html" target="_blank">makes a few people happy</a>. But where does the end of the eight-year-empire leave us as people and a country? Will we do anything to address the crimes the Bush administration has committed? There are <a href="http://www.americancenturynow.org" target="_blank">plenty of reasons to impeach Bush and Cheney</a>; are we just going to move along like a big dysfunctional family as if nothing ever happened? Part of me wants to do that, but part of me feels like not addressing what has happened will encourage other megalomaniacs to repeat the pattern. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/12/we-bought-the-farm-now-hes-selling-the-ranch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Be A Such A Dick Cheney</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/09/dont-be-a-such-a-dick-cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/09/dont-be-a-such-a-dick-cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiretapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EFF Suing Every John, Dick, and Alberto They Can Think Of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="bodytextsm" style="text-align: center;"><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/cheney-headcrush-185.jpg" alt="" width="152" height="185" /><br />
Dick Cheney Shows Us<br />
How Much He Cares</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s likely to get you <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/09/rights-group-su.html" target="_blank">sued</a>. In the ongoing legislative cat and mouse game that AT&amp;T and the White House are playing to keep their ability to stick their eyes, ears, and noses into every aspect of your personal life, the Electronic Frontier Foundation is once again <a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/09/17-0" target="_blank">stepping up to bat for you</a>. After AT&amp;T <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/25/blue_dogs" target="_blank">bought enough dinners &amp; prostitutes for politicians</a> over the past several months, they eventually managed to get the bastards to <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92383286" target="_blank">grant them immunity</a> for their part in illegally tapping our phones in the guise of protecting us. (Personally, my experiences with AT&amp;T&#8217;s service and billing suggest I&#8217;ll be just fine without whatever protection they might be providing, thank you very much.) It&#8217;s a major show of dedication to protecting your constitutional rights on the part of the EFF; you might think about <a href="https://secure.eff.org/site/Donation?ACTION=SHOW_DONATION_OPTIONS&amp;CAMPAIGN_ID=1741&amp;JServSessionIdr012=jwwvo53461.app13b " target="_blank">giving <em>them</em> some of your money</a> , rather than giving it to those two senators running for president, one of whom voted for the bill after <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/10/obama_camp_says_it_hell_support_filibuster_of_any_bill_containing_telecom_immunity.php" target="_blank">saying he would filibuster against it</a>, the other of whom didn&#8217;t vote at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/09/dont-be-a-such-a-dick-cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Do You Think They Call Him Dick?</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/06/why-do-you-think-they-call-him-dick/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/06/why-do-you-think-they-call-him-dick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baghdad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quagmire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. occupation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Cheney explains why we shouldn't invade Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick Cheney explains why, if the U.S. had continued to Baghdad in the first Gulf War, there &#8220;&#8230;would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq&#8230;&#8221; and how it would have been &#8220;&#8230;a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YENbElb5-xY&amp;hl=en" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YENbElb5-xY&amp;hl=en"></embed></object></p>
<p><span id="more-27"></span></p>
<p>Q: Do you think the U.S., or U.N. forces, should have moved into Baghdad?<br />
CHENEY: No.<br />
Q: Why not?<br />
CHENEY: Because if we&#8217;d gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn&#8217;t have been anybody else with us. There would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq. Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein&#8217;s government, then what are you going to put in its place? That&#8217;s a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off &#8212; part of it the Syrians would like to have to the west, part of eastern Iraq the Iranians would like to claim, fought over it for eight years. In the north you&#8217;ve got the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. It&#8217;s a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/06/why-do-you-think-they-call-him-dick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
