<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dissociatedpress.com &#187; Popular Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissociatedpress.com/category/popular_media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissociatedpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 01:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Solar System Circular Orbit Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/03/the-solar-system-circular-orbit-conspiracy/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/03/the-solar-system-circular-orbit-conspiracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 05:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helical Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nassim Haramein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vortex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=4359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a vast science conspiracy dating back to the time of Copernicus? Probably not, but this video is fun anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4360" style="border: 0px none; margin: 5px 10px;" title="spiral-orbits-250" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/spiral-orbits-250.png" alt="" width="250" height="141" />Did you know that science is perpetrating a vast global conspiracy to prevent you from knowing the truth about the shape of our solar system&#8217;s orbits? Yeah, me neither. Remember how in school they taught us that the planets all move in a circular orbit around the sun? And later, when they thought we could handle it, they admitted that they had lied, and that the orbits were actually elliptical? Well, the fascinating video below (which might be more fascinating with a different soundtrack) finally reveals the shocking truth that scientists have been hiding from us all along! Or not. As cool as the clip is, and although it highlights an interesting aspect of relative motion in a rather visual way, most of the hyperbole in its claims about this radical &#8220;new&#8221; vortex model of the solar system that is somehow destined to replace the &#8220;old Newtonion [sic]/Copernican Heliocentric model&#8221; is exactly that. There is nothing new about looking at the motion of the planets in this way, and in spite of the fact that the video highlights the fact that the sun is indeed not a fixed ball like the one at the local planetarium, it also is itself a pretty inaccurate representation of the relative motion it intends to convey. Ignore the fact that <a href="http://www.djsadhu.com/the-helical-model-vortex-solar-system-animation" target="_blank">the creator of the video</a> cites sources like <a href="http://www.feandft.com/Dr.%20Bhat.htm" target="_blank">Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat</a> and Nassim Haramein, the <a href="http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nassim_Haramein" target="_blank">physics crank</a>, whose cred is mostly derived from his appearance as an &#8220;expert&#8221; in the wacky conspiracy movie <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/09/thrive-the-movie">Thrive</a>. He may just be doing it for page views, or maybe he actually believes it. Who cares. The video is fun, and I&#8217;d bet a nickel that you&#8217;ve never thought about the fact that on top of the Earth rotating on its axis as it revolves around the sun, we&#8217;re also moving in a dizzying spiral through the galaxy, occasionally dipping into the dense arm of it <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080502092145.htm" target="_blank">long enough to cause mass extinctions</a>  . Video below. <span id="more-4359"></span></p>
<p><object width="490" height="276" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0jHsq36_NTU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="490" height="276" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0jHsq36_NTU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/03/the-solar-system-circular-orbit-conspiracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Are Your Torches &amp; Pitchforks? Why Aren&#8217;t You Mad As Hell?</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/02/where-are-your-torches-pitchforks-why-arent-you-mad-as-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/02/where-are-your-torches-pitchforks-why-arent-you-mad-as-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Beale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oliver stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Untold History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=4148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1976 film "Network" may offer some insight. You see, the world is a business, and if you don't like your job in it, you better get a new one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4149" title="torches-and-pitchforks-225" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/torches-and-pitchforks-225.png" alt="" width="225" height="241" />The other day I had a conversation with a few friends in which we were sharing our collective befuddlement regarding the epic new levels of American Apathy. We agreed that it was hard to understand how people could seem so unconcerned about things, and ran through the typical list of things that people <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>should</em></span> be enraged about but aren&#8217;t. Things like the Bush administration lies that mired us in war, their reckless deregulation that contributed to the bailouts, and the banskters arrogant behavior <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>after</em></span> the bailouts, when they paid themselves bigger bonuses than ever. Or our presumed &#8220;good guy&#8221; Obama, who was elected on promises of reform and transparency, but who started the deceit before he was even elected, by <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/20/in_a_shift_obama_rejects_public_funding/?page=full" target="_blank">reversing himself on public campaign funding</a> and <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/blogtalk-obamas-fisa-vote" target="_blank">voting for FISA</a>. And then proceeded to <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/12/28/168220266/congress-extends-fisa-wiretapping-act-to-2017-awaits-obamas-signature" target="_blank">maintain Bush-era secrecy</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/16/AR2010121606200.html" target="_blank">tax cuts</a>, uphold the Patriot Act, keep Guantanamo open, and create a health care plan that benefits the insurance industry more than the insured. And then added a whole NEW level of hostility abroad, with drone attacks and the &#8220;surge&#8221; in Afghanistan. Or the entire culture of modern American governing itself, which sneers at honesty, integrity, and the collective good as naive concepts, primarily so it can comfortably perpetuate its pervasive bribery and grift system under the epically misleading term &#8220;lobbying&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just the short list; also discussed were the outright crimes of big Pharma, health care, the energy industry, the military industrial complex, corporate media, and the new industries and agencies built around creating a surveillance state. As is typically the case in discussions like this, the sources of information <span id="more-4148"></span>being discussed were referenced a lot. Toward the end of our &#8220;How To Fix The World Conference&#8221; of 2013, someone mentioned <a href="http://www.sho.com/sho/oliver-stones-untold-history-of-the-united-states/season/1/episode/10#/index" target="_blank">the last episode</a> in Oliver Stone&#8217;s recent &#8220;Untold History&#8221; series (also available <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1451613512/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1451613512&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20" target="_blank">as a book</a><img class=" ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1451613512" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" />), in which he talked about how all these insane things had happened in business and government since the year 2000, and how the public seemed utterly indifferent, apparently easily distracted by increasingly bizarre &#8220;reality&#8221; TV shows. And that&#8217;s when it hit me; <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>that&#8217;s</em></span> when I realized why everyone is really so apathetic.</p>
<p>I had recently watched the 1976 film <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000CNESU8/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000CNESU8&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20" target="_blank">Network</a><img class=" ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms ndurznxljmqewdxnuqms" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B000CNESU8" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" /> for the first time in ages, and had been struck by how much the fictional network <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Broadcasting_System" target="_blank">UBS</a> &#8211; which at the time probably seemed like a preposterous and absurd notion &#8211; had in fact actually come into existence, in the form of Fox News. Why aren&#8217;t people picking up their torches and pitchforks? Perhaps it&#8217;s because they&#8217;ve found their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Beale_%28Network%29" target="_blank">Howard Beale</a> . If you haven&#8217;t seen this gem written by Sidney Lumet, Beale &#8211; the guy who tells America to lean out their windows and yell &#8220;I&#8217;m mad as hell, and I&#8217;m not gonna take it!&#8221; &#8211; is described as &#8220;an angry prophet denouncing the hypocrisies of our times&#8221; who is &#8220;articulating the popular rage&#8221;. If you&#8217;ve ever seen Glenn Beck, Bill O&#8217;Reilly, or their mellower liberal counterparts, the Beale character would not come across as nearly as insane as he did when the film came out. And that&#8217;s when I remembered the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKkRDMil0bw" target="_blank">epic monologue</a> (clip below) by the network executive Arthur Jensen, which he gave in order to get Meade back in line after his rants had disrupted a multibillion dollar deal the network was making. And <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>that&#8217;s</em></span> when I remembered why we may as well just leave our torches and pitchforks in the shed. The world&#8217;s a business, and if you don&#8217;t like your job, you better get a new one. Or shut up, order a pizza, and flip on the TV.</p>
<p><object width="490" height="276" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NKkRDMil0bw?hl=en_US&amp;version=3&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="490" height="276" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NKkRDMil0bw?hl=en_US&amp;version=3&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /> </object></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4150" title="howard-beale" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/howard-beale.jpg" alt="" width="494" height="278" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/02/where-are-your-torches-pitchforks-why-arent-you-mad-as-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Put on Some Nice Shorts and Enjoy Sundance At Your Leisure</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/put-on-some-nice-shorts-and-enjoy-sundance-at-your-leisure/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/put-on-some-nice-shorts-and-enjoy-sundance-at-your-leisure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film festivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=4108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn't get invited to Sundance AGAIN this year? Put on some nice shorts and enjoy it anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4109" style="border: 0px none; margin: 5px 10px;" title="Sundance-2013" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Sundance-2013.png" alt="" width="225" height="225" />As much as I love film, and as much as I love festivals, I&#8217;m not sure if I love <em>film festivals</em>. I&#8217;ve attended plenty, but in spite of living in a town that presents one of the best festivals in the world &#8211; the <a href="http://aafilmfest.org" target="_blank">Ann Arbor Film Festival </a> &#8211; I haven&#8217;t even attended <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>that</em></span> one since we gave it <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/tag/ann-arbor-film-festival">light coverage here</a> a couple of years ago. Looking back, the year I stopped being so enthused about them was around 2000, which coincides almost precisely with the widespread availability of the &#8220;time shifted viewing&#8221; that the web and digital recorders have made possible. Combine that with the fact that I never much enjoyed hobnobbing with mobs of film snobs and hypersocial restaurant workers with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_Actors_Guild" target="_blank">SAG</a> cards anyway, and film festivals have sort of become a thing of the past for me. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m ecstatic that when I <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>can&#8217;t</em></span> attend a festival like Sundance, there&#8217;s a good chance that at least portions of it will be available online. Not that I&#8217;ve <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>ever</em></span> been to Sundance; to be honest, I&#8217;d probably only go if <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphine_Chan%C3%A9ac" target="_blank">Delphine Chanéac</a> asked me to be her date. So we can probably rest assured I won&#8217;t be attending Sundance any time soon. Anyway, one of the highlights of Sundance having an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/sff" target="_blank">online presence</a> this year was the selection of shorts available on one of their <a href="http://www.youtube.com/ytscreeningroom" target="_blank">YouTube channels</a>. As I&#8217;ve pointed out before, I have <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/tag/short-film">a fetish for short film</a>, so below I&#8217;ve selected a couple of favorites from this year&#8217;s Sundance collection, as well as another exceptional short called VOICE OVER that <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>wasn&#8217;t</em></span> at Sundance. Enjoy, and see you at the festival. On line. <span id="more-4108"></span></p>
<h2><a href="http://vimeo.com/58150375" target="_blank">VOICE OVER</a></h2>
<p>This <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>wasn&#8217;t</em></span> in the Sundance collection on YouTube, but is awesome. To say more would ruin the reward of taking the few minutes to watch it, ideally in full screen.</p>
<p><object width="490" height="275" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=58150375&amp;force_embed=1&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;autoplay=0&amp;loop=0" /><embed width="490" height="275" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=58150375&amp;force_embed=1&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;autoplay=0&amp;loop=0" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" /></object></p>
<h2><a href="http://youtu.be/pdtDU8Ww7mA" target="_blank">THE APOCALYPSE </a></h2>
<p>Don&#8217;t let this one give you any clever ideas.</p>
<p><object width="490" height="276" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pdtDU8Ww7mA?hl=en_US&amp;version=3&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="490" height="276" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pdtDU8Ww7mA?hl=en_US&amp;version=3&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></p>
<h2><a href="http://youtu.be/3scQ0wq5zLE" target="_blank">CATNIP: EGRESS TO OBLIVION?</a></h2>
<p>It&#8217;s probably about time we took a look at this troubling abuse issue.</p>
<p><object width="490" height="276" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3scQ0wq5zLE?hl=en_US&amp;version=3&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="490" height="276" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3scQ0wq5zLE?hl=en_US&amp;version=3&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/put-on-some-nice-shorts-and-enjoy-sundance-at-your-leisure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Demotivator &#8211; Are You the Type to Test Your Font of Wisdom?</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/monday-demotivator-are-you-the-type-to-test-your-font-of-wisdom/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/monday-demotivator-are-you-the-type-to-test-your-font-of-wisdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typefaces]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=4028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you think you know your Impact from your Hattenschweiler? Your Georgia from your Palatino? Prove it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><span class="bodytextsm"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4032" title="a-letter-225b" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/a-letter-225b.png" alt="" width="225" height="157" /><br />
My girlfriend sent me a letter.<br />
So I tested and graded it.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s been a long time since we did the <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/tag/monday-demotivator">Monday Demotivators</a>; as we <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/12/holiday-time-killers">pointed out</a> when we stopped, with so many people unemployed, it didn&#8217;t seem there was anyone to demotivate on Mondays any more!  But the other day my girlfriend sent me a letter that inspired me. I mean <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>literally</em></span> sent me a letter. It was the letter &#8220;B&#8221;, and she needed to know what typeface it was. And before I go on, let&#8217;s just <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typeface#Terminology" target="_blank">clarify the difference between typeface and font</a>, so the more graphically inclined in your life don&#8217;t cringe every time you say &#8220;font&#8221;. Anyway, since my girlfriend had so little character &#8211; or only <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>one</em></span> character anyway &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t use the easiest cheat, the <a href="http://www.myfonts.com/WhatTheFont" target="_blank">What The Font tool</a> at MyFonts.com. So in the process, I learned that &#8211; like any normal person &#8211; she couldn&#8217;t tell Palatino from Times, Ariel from Helvetica, or Futura from Avant Garde. I also learned that in spite of hundreds of hours of yearning, searching, and kerning, I&#8217;m a bit of a typetard myself. Are YOU a font of typeface wisdom? Let&#8217;s find out. First, a super easy test, especially if you&#8217;re hipster enough to have seen the film <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000VWEFP8/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000VWEFP8">Helvetica</a><img class=" elqbcislrzzwwhgilmfo elqbcislrzzwwhgilmfo elqbcislrzzwwhgilmfo" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B000VWEFP8" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" />. If you can&#8217;t pass the <a href="http://www.ironicsans.com/helvarialquiz" target="_blank">So you think you can tell Arial from Helvetica?</a> quiz, you&#8217;re a total noob. Your next logical choice if you failed that one would be <a href="http://mentalfloss.com/node/13212/take" target="_blank">Sara Newton&#8217;s Fontastic Quiz</a>, which provides some verbal cues for the fontographically impaired. Bumping it up a notch, we have the <a href="http://ilovetypography.com/ifontgame" target="_blank">iFont game</a> , which is still multiple choice, but a little challenging. Which is why the original version was called <a href="http://fontgame.ilovetypography.com" target="_blank">The Rather Difficult Font Game</a>. And if you&#8217;re more interested in knowing what type YOU are, rather than the other way around, you may want to try the <a href="http://www.pentagram.com/what-type-are-you test " target="_blank">What Type Are You</a> (has audio) from the design firm Pentagram. Happy Monday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/monday-demotivator-are-you-the-type-to-test-your-font-of-wisdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Having a Bad Day? Put Things in Perspective with the &#8220;Overview Effect&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/having-a-bad-day-put-things-in-perspective-with-the-overview-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/having-a-bad-day-put-things-in-perspective-with-the-overview-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edgar Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overview effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savikalpa samadhi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=3970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we could put everyone in orbit just once, the world would be a radically different place.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3971" style="border: 0px none; margin: 5px 10px;" title="overview-effect-225" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/overview-effect-225.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="96" /> I could ramble about the impact of this idea for paragraphs, but <a href="http://www.planetarycollective.com" target="_blank">the producers of The Overview Effect</a> probably summarize it best: &#8220;The Overview Effect, first described by author Frank White in 1987, is an experience that transforms astronauts’ perspective of the planet and mankind’s place upon it. Common features of the experience are a feeling of awe for the planet, a profound understanding of the interconnection of all life, and a renewed sense of responsibility for taking care of the environment.&#8221; I personally was struck by Apollo astronaut Edgar Mitchell&#8217;s explanation of his search for how to describe his experience of seeing the Earth from space, which led him to discover <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savikalpa" target="_blank">Savikalpa Samadhi</a>, which, as he puts it &#8220;means that you see things as you see them with your eyes, but you experience them emotionally and viscerally, as with ecstasy, and a sense of total unity and oneness.&#8221;</p>
<p>This video will totally be worth the 20 minutes it steals from your life, and might change your day. View it below, or better yet, <a href="http://vimeo.com/55073825" target="_blank"> right on Vimeo</a>  in fullscreen HD.</p>
<p><!-- This version of the embed code is no longer supported. Learn more: https://vimeo.com/help/faq/embedding --> <object width="490" height="209" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=55073825&amp;force_embed=1&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=00adef&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;autoplay=0&amp;loop=0" /><embed width="490" height="209" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=55073825&amp;force_embed=1&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=00adef&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;autoplay=0&amp;loop=0" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/having-a-bad-day-put-things-in-perspective-with-the-overview-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Other Internet is a Tablet</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/my-other-internet-is-a-tablet/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/my-other-internet-is-a-tablet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 03:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anil dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=3889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the web is dead, this website sucks, and why you'll see me on your Kindle soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="250" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><span class="bodytextsm"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3890" title="newsweek-last-print-edition" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/newsweek-last-print-edition.png" alt="" width="225" height="215" /><br />
Not only did they use a hashtag on the cover of the final print edition, probably the only way you can get a copy of the thing is <a class="bodytextsmlink" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000ZLY992/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000ZLY992">on the Kindle.</a><img class=" bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr qjazcgoidlmxurjwhgzi" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B000ZLY992" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" /></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying that the internet is dead <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2010/07/how-seo-google-wordpress-and-facebook-are-ruining-the-web-and-ruining-you">for a while now</a>, but apparently people only listen when you say this kind of thing <a href="http://dashes.com/anil/2012/12/the-web-we-lost.html" target="_blank">if you&#8217;re Anil Dash</a>. If you visit that link, please note the irony of the fact that his comment section is handled by a Facebook widget. But really, let&#8217;s face it. The web is dead. Google has turned search into an SEO-poisoned gutter of desperate web marketers paying to rank in Google so that Google will pay them for ranking. eBay is a shark-infested cesspool of hustlers and bidbots. And social networking? Puh-LEEZE. No one ever read your tweets anyway, and Facebook has served its only useful purpose, which was letting you re-connect with that long lost flame that previously you could only &#8220;Guilt Google&#8221; (when you weren&#8217;t busy <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2008/12/dont-be-a-googlewanker/">Googlewanking</a>) so you could either hook up, or finally remember why you lost track of each other in the first place. Why am I so adamant that social is dead? Well, about five years ago, while doing a little work I cringeingly called &#8220;Social Network Consulting&#8221;, I ran into a friend who actually had that printed on her business card! I asked her: &#8220;So what does <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>that</em></span> mean? You charge people to tell them to use Facebook and Twitter?&#8221; Our pockets &#8211; bulging with consulting fees &#8211; bounced as we had a belly laugh. Well guess what. There are now over <a href="http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/181-000-social-media-gurus-ninjas-masters-mavens-twitter/239026" target="_blank">180,000 Social Media Experts on Twitter</a>! Presumably, they&#8217;re all telling you how great Twitter is. At least they don&#8217;t waste entire paragraphs doing it, right? The last possible hope of the web getting interesting again was dangled before us not too long ago with the exciting label <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User-generated_content" target="_blank">user generated content</a>. I have a FEW things to say about THAT one. First of all, all you &#8220;users&#8221; have proven not only that you&#8217;re not capable of producing content worth reading, you don&#8217;t even stick to it! Just Google &#8220;I haven&#8217;t posted in a while&#8221;, and not only do you get 820 million results, Google conveniently suggests the more useful &#8220;<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>sorry</em></span> I haven&#8217;t posted in a while&#8221;. People also became disheartened quickly when they finally produced that book on Blurb or someplace, and even their FRIENDS didn&#8217;t by copies. Likewise when their <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/10/5-kickstarter-alternatives-that-may-save-your-social-life/">Kickstarter campaign generated 200 bucks</a> instead of the ten grand they had hoped for. Even the website you&#8217;re reading this article on sucks! It&#8217;s poorly-coded for mobile devices, the articles are too long, and thanks to the content scrapers &#8211; who prefer to call themselves &#8220;curators&#8221; so they don&#8217;t feel badly for building entire websites with other people&#8217;s original content &#8211; it ranks infinitely lower in search engines than it did even a year ago. (Insider secret: we&#8217;re shutting down to move to a new platform in the coming months)</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not here to tell you how horrible life will be because of all this, I&#8217;m here to tell you how COOL it will be. A few interesting things happened last year. One was<span id="more-3889"></span> that while <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323874204578219313474627332.html" target="_blank">physical retail sales were soft</a>, increasing by 2-4%, online sales were <a href="http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/1/2012_U.S._Online_Holiday_Spending_Grows_14_Percent_vs_Year_Ago_to_42.3_Billion" target="_blank">through the roof</a>, growing by about 14%  . You don&#8217;t need fancy market surveys to figure this out; you could see tumbleweeds in the malls this last holiday season, but it was common to run into a FEDEX or UPS driver at 7pm during that time, and if you did, they were sweating, panting, and on the verge of collapse. And you know one thing that was likely to be in those parcels they were delivering? A tablet. <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2245390/Christmas-shoppers-snap-tablet-EVERY-SECOND-sales-1-000-year.html " target="_blank">Sales were up ONE THOUSAND PERCENT</a> last year. That means someone was buying a tablet EVERY SINGLE SECOND during the holidays. I can confirm this flurry of sales; I can&#8217;t tell you how many weird messages I received over the holidays until friends learned to turn off Spell Check on their <a href="http://www.amazon.com/kindle-store-ebooks-newspapers-blogs/b/?_encoding=UTF8&amp;node=133141011&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957" target="_blank">Kindle Fire</a><img class=" bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr qjazcgoidlmxurjwhgzi" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" />.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t pieced together how these factors are going to converge to kick the last breath out of the web as we know it, you obviously haven&#8217;t struggled to get your tablet to show web pages in their non-mobile version. And you haven&#8217;t noticed that Microsoft not only ditched the desktop (something <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2411445,00.asp" target="_blank">some users couldn&#8217;t handle</a>) in their new operating system, but for the first time ever, they built <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00AA04LUA/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00AA04LUA">their own hardware</a><img class=" bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr bgnuqqhgtzdfxgegjesr qjazcgoidlmxurjwhgzi" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B00AA04LUA" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" /> to deliver it, and it&#8217;s basically a tablet. And maybe you haven&#8217;t noticed (as <a href="http://kickyourass101.com/about-the-authors.htm" target="_blank">my pal Nick</a> pointed out to me the other day) that it&#8217;s been over a year since <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1449176&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20" target="_blank">eBook sales on Amazon outstripped book sales </a>. You also probably haven&#8217;t been reading something on your tablet, gotten curious about a book that is mentioned, and experienced the bizarre exhilaration of OWNING AND READING that book five minutes later. Here&#8217;s an example of one of the ways you may end up doing this. Below is a Beta version of a tool that displays the preview of a Kindle book, right in a web page. In this case it&#8217;s MY book. Tell me that &#8211; especially if you&#8217;re on a Kindle &#8211; this won&#8217;t lead you to buy a book eventually, pulling you off the web to actually READ something. Especially when print institutions like Newsweek are <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324660404578201432812202750.html" target="_blank">going digital only</a>. Soon, the trick is going to be getting you back ON the web.</p>
<p>Check out the preview of our book. Then BUY it!</p>
<p>(Also, let us know if this widget isn&#8217;t visible, we&#8217;re still testing)</p>
<div class="iframe-wrapper">
  <iframe src="http://kindleweb.s3.amazonaws.com/app/1.0.11.053.093655/KindleReaderApp.html?asin=B007SWXVRC&amp;assoctag=dissociatedpress-20?" frameborder="0" style="height:800px;width:490px;">Please upgrade your browser</iframe>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2013/01/my-other-internet-is-a-tablet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enter the Void</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/01/enter-the-void/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/01/enter-the-void/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enter the Void]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaspar Noé]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soundtrack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=3532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you've never died, done hallucinogenic drugs, had an out of body experience, or been in a serious car crash, you may have trouble connecting with the film "Enter the Void". I've done pretty much all of those things, so this may be one of my favorite films in a decade.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Enter-Void-Nathaniel-Brown/dp/B0048LPRCS?tag=dissociatedpress-20" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-3534 alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 5px 10px;" title="enter-the-void-250" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/enter-the-void-250.jpg" alt="Enter The Void on DVD" width="250" height="363" /></a>If you&#8217;ve never died, done hallucinogenic drugs, had an out of body experience, or been in a serious car crash, you may have trouble connecting with the film <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0048LPRD2/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0048LPRD2" target="_blank">Enter the Void</a><img class=" utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B0048LPRD2" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" />. I&#8217;ve done pretty much all of those things, so in spite of rather mixed reviews, this is probably one of my favorite films in years. I don&#8217;t know how I didn&#8217;t hear about this film when it came out in 2010, but&#8230;ah, scratch that. Clocking in at 2 hours and 41 minutes, and being comprised mainly of visually stunning, meandering shots of Tokyo sex clubs, street scenes, car crashes, swirling colors, and neon landscapes that connect a bunch of vignettes that border on pornographic or feature death, drug abuse, sex, and birth, the film didn&#8217;t enjoy a very wide release or much promotion in the states. Which is a shame, because I think &#8211; with one trivial criticism &#8211; it borders on being a cinematic masterpiece, eschewing tired, 120-page-script-driven storytelling to embrace the amazing tools that film puts at one&#8217;s fingertips. I would be willing to bet that this is a film that David Lynch would have wished he <em>could</em> have made, which for many, of course, would be a solid argument AGAINST the idea that it might be a masterpiece. In any case, while reading negative reviews one thing you&#8217;ll consistently notice is that the reviewer will say incredibly thick-headed, entertainment-biased things about plot development, acting skills, or their frustration with the length or having to view the back of the central character&#8217;s head more than they&#8217;d like. As a film lover since childhood, reviews like this simply affirm to me that this is indeed a great film; if you&#8217;re not pissing someone off, you&#8217;re probably doing it wrong. And director <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaspar_No%C3%A9" target="_blank">Gaspar Noé</a>  does it <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>right</em></span> in this film, managing to tell a textured, multi-layered story that is only simplistic &#8211; or &#8220;puerile&#8221; as one critic put it &#8211; if you&#8217;re too stupid or impatient or lazy to grasp what is being explored. The &#8220;plot&#8221; is launched by the main character Oscar&#8217;s introduction to the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590300599/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1590300599" target="_blank">The Tibetan Book of the Dead</a><img class=" utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai utfageseenbohheeevai" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1590300599" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" /> as he starts a drug trip, and then is presumably killed. The ensuing two hours are a journey through life, death, base human experience, beauty, love, loss, and more, brilliantly told with little dialogue. Most of the film is a seamlessly connected series of mostly overhead shots as you journey from interior to interior, to the night streets of Tokyo, to strange &#8220;other worlds&#8221; of light and sound, and to flashback scenes from childhood. Thanks to remarkable implementation of boom shots, helicopter shots, handheld, CGI, lighting effects, and even tilt-shift-like focus effects, it&#8217;s impossible to tell &#8211; and therefore not disruptive to the flow &#8211; when one or another is being utilized. The stunning visuals are lent much of their effectiveness and seamlessness by some of the most brilliant sound design I&#8217;ve ever experienced. Arguably one of the most overlooked apects of creating film as art, Enter the Void&#8217;s &#8220;soundtrack&#8221; is on par with films like 2001 in terms of sound as an integrated part of stoytelling, which is probably not a coincidence &#8211; apparently Gaspar Noé saw 2001 at the age of seven, inspiring him at that point to become a filmmaker. If you&#8217;re interested in the technical aspects of how the film was made, there&#8217;s a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enter_the_Void#Filming" target="_blank">detailed summary on Wikipedia</a>. But I honestly wouldn&#8217;t recommend reading much about the plot, the technique, or the critical reception &#8211; I&#8217;ve said far too much here. The film just left enough of an impression on me that I had to spread the word. I personally saw the film after seeing nothing more than the image below. I somehow knew instantly that the film had something I needed to experience, and I was not disappointed. If you decide to check it out, just make sure you actually have the time and space to enjoy the film &#8211; it&#8217;s not for the impatient, and is as long and ponderous as it is brilliant. <span id="more-3532"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3533" title="enter-the-void-500" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/enter-the-void-500.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="367" /></p>
<p>For the record, the trailer doesn&#8217;t BEGIN to do the film justice, probably for commercial reasons, it focuses on dialogue and erotica. And although there&#8217;s a lot of unerotic &#8220;erotica&#8221; in the film, it&#8217;s hardly the core of the story.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="284" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bKRxDP--e-Y?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="500" height="284" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bKRxDP--e-Y?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowFullScreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2012/01/enter-the-void/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alien Invasion Films 2011: Block, Schlock, and Earthlings In Peril</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/11/alien-invasion-films-2011-blocks-schlock-and-earthlings-in-peril/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/11/alien-invasion-films-2011-blocks-schlock-and-earthlings-in-peril/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attack the Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle: Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skyline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=3349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The teen heroes of the last year's best alien invasion film "Attack The Block" will probably save the Earth, but they'll have to ask mom first. And thanks to the massive marketing budgets of "Battle: Los Angeles" and "Skyline", their working-class heroism has gone largely unacknowledged.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005J4TLN4?tag=dissociatedpress-20"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3350" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 5px 10px;" title="attack-the-block-250" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/attack-the-block-250.jpg" alt="attack the block DVD" width="250" height="187" /></a>I have a suggestion for the makers of alien invasion schlockbusters <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0034G4ORC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B0034G4ORC" target="_blank">Battle: Los Angeles</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B0034G4ORC&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003Y5H5GK/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B003Y5H5GK" target="_blank">Skyline</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B003Y5H5GK&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />. I think they should surrender enough of their grotesquely immense profits to the makers of the REAL winner of the past year&#8217;s alien invasion movie invasion &#8211; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005J4TLN4/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B005J4TLN4" target="_blank">Attack the Block</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B005J4TLN4&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; that it at least breaks even at the box office. I mean, I&#8217;m not going to be <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110309/REVIEWS/110309992" target="_blank">as mean as Roger Ebert </a> about it, but as excellent as &#8220;Saving Private Ryan&#8221;, &#8220;Blackhawk Down&#8221;, and &#8220;District 9&#8243; were, there&#8217;s no need to spend 70 million bucks chopping them together haphazardly into ANOTHER film, wasting thousands of people-hours of solid acting, dynamic camera work, and expensive consultations with the military, only to turn out a heartless war movie sprinkled sparingly with aliens. And &#8220;Skyline&#8221; &#8211; in spite of its inventive alien visuals and the potential in its &#8220;human brains as energy&#8221; premise &#8211; seemed to share two of the greatest weaknesses of &#8220;Battle&#8221;. If you&#8217;re going to hire a bunch of actors and make them act a bunch, at least let them act like people someone will CARE about. In both films, I think many viewers probably CHEERED the demise of key characters not only because they were fundamentally unlikeable, but also because it meant the movie would end that much sooner. At least in films like &#8220;Independence Day&#8221; you got to see absurdly gratifying moments like Will Smith dragging the alien through the desert cussing. If you haven&#8217;t seen &#8220;Attack The Block&#8221;, put it on the top of your list. It&#8217;s probably one of the most fun alien invasion films since <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001ECDVKE/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399369&amp;creativeASIN=B001ECDVKE" target="_blank">Mars Attacks!</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B001ECDVKE&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399369" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> It was produced by the same people that brought us &#8220;Shaun of the Dead&#8221;, and is a gratifying 88 minutes of stylish visuals, amusingly engaging action, and meta-ironic social commentary. All taking place in a single working class flatblock of South London. Hilariously, for the film&#8217;s American release, Sony Pictures came close to adding subtitles, concerned that American audiences wouldn&#8217;t be able to understand the characters&#8217; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicultural_London_English" target="_blank">South London &#8220;Jafaican&#8221; accents</a>. Thankfully, they left well enough alone; the street slang banter of the kids as they battle the aliens is about half of the genius of the film. You owe it to yourself to watch &#8220;Attack&#8221; the next time you&#8217;re looking for some humorous adventure in your sci-fi, and we ALL owe it to the film&#8217;s creators to at least help them break even. This little flick is a gem. <span id="more-3349"></span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005J4TLN4/ref=as_li_ss_il?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B005J4TLN4"><img src="http://ws.assoc-amazon.com/widgets/q?_encoding=UTF8&amp;Format=_SL110_&amp;ASIN=B005J4TLN4&amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;ID=AsinImage&amp;WS=1&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;ServiceVersion=20070822" border="0" alt="" /></a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B005J4TLN4&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005J4TLN4/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B005J4TLN4">Attack the Block</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B005J4TLN4&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> is hands down the best of the last year&#8217;s alien invasion films. Sadly, in spite of its meager 13 million dollar budget, it still hasn&#8217;t broken even with a box office of just over 5 million as of this writing. Budget: $13 million, Box Office: $5,287,439</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003Y5H5GK/ref=as_li_ss_il?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B003Y5H5GK"><img src="http://ws.assoc-amazon.com/widgets/q?_encoding=UTF8&amp;Format=_SL110_&amp;ASIN=B003Y5H5GK&amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;ID=AsinImage&amp;WS=1&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;ServiceVersion=20070822" border="0" alt="" /></a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B003Y5H5GK&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003Y5H5GK/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B003Y5H5GK">Skyline</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B003Y5H5GK&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> has some stylish aliens, but I think the general intention of having a bunch of people act a lot before you kill them is to give viewers a chance to get to like them. I rather enjoyed the demise of the characters myself. Budget: $20 million, Box Office: $67,520,213</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0034G4ORC/ref=as_li_ss_il?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B0034G4ORC"><img src="http://ws.assoc-amazon.com/widgets/q?_encoding=UTF8&amp;Format=_SL110_&amp;ASIN=B0034G4ORC&amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;ID=AsinImage&amp;WS=1&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;ServiceVersion=20070822" border="0" alt="" /></a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B0034G4ORC&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td>
<td>The makers of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0034G4ORC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B0034G4ORC">Battle: Los Angeles</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B0034G4ORC&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> tried to sue the makers of Skyline, who were also their special effects people. While this may have been somewhat legit, it may have helped if the creators of the film were creating something more than a mashup of &#8220;Private Ryan&#8221;, &#8220;District 9&#8243; and &#8220;Blackhawk Down&#8221;. Budget: $70 million,</p>
<p>Box Office: $202,466,756</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004C3J76Y/ref=as_li_ss_il?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B004C3J76Y"><img src="http://ws.assoc-amazon.com/widgets/q?_encoding=UTF8&amp;Format=_SL110_&amp;ASIN=B004C3J76Y&amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;ID=AsinImage&amp;WS=1&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;ServiceVersion=20070822" border="0" alt="" /></a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B004C3J76Y&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td>
<td>What a difference an &#8220;of&#8221; makes. Replace the colon in Battle:Los Angeles. Release it on the same weekend. Profit. This mockbuster probably has done more to confuse consumers than Skyline EVER could. Interestingly, the movie isn&#8217;t even set in LA. Budget: N/A, Box Office: N/A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/11/alien-invasion-films-2011-blocks-schlock-and-earthlings-in-peril/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problema &#8211; The Film</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/10/problema-the-film/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/10/problema-the-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bebelplatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralf Schmerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wings of Desire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=3307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What has 224 legs, 336 eyes, takes 5 years to mature, and lives for 95 minutes? One of the most thought-provoking films you'll ever see, Problema.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><span class="bodytextsm"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3308" title="problema-film-aerial-250" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/problema-film-aerial-250.jpg" alt="Aerial view of the shoot of Problema" width="250" height="141" /><br />
An aerial view of the &#8220;set&#8221; of Problema<br />
</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>What would happen if you rounded up thought-provoking questions from people all over the world, then gathered about a hundred thoughtful people together in a huge circle, pointed cameras at them, and asked the questions one by one? Well, a cacophonous murmur would probably ensue, until you edited the results into some kind of cohesive whole, as director Ralf Schmerberg did with his epic film project <a href="http://www.problema-thefilm.org" target="_blank">Problema</a>. The project was inspired by the <a href="http://www.droppingknowledge.org" target="_blank">Dropping Knowledge</a> project, a global information sharing and media project founded in 2003. On a single day in September, 2006, over a hundred individuals &#8211; artists, scientists, writers, business people, and other thinkers &#8211; took their place around a huge circle in Berlin&#8217;s<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bebelplatz" target="_blank"> Bebelplatz</a>. This was a powerfully symbolic choice &#8211; the Bebelplatz was the location of the infamous <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bebelplatz#Nazi_book_burnings" target="_blank">Nazi book burnings of 1933</a>. With digital cameras pointed at each guest, hosts Willem Dafoe and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafsat_Abiola" target="_blank">Hafsat Abiola</a> (founder of Nigeria&#8217;s <a href="http://www.kind.org" target="_blank">Kudirat Initiative for Democracy</a>) asked 17 of 100 questions that had been selected from the thousands that were submitted worldwide via the Dropping Knowledge project. The guests then responded in their own time, with the cameras all running continuously, all framing the guests in a tight headshot. Guest Wim Wenders &#8211; director of the film <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002IVDLGY/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=dissociatedpress-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373&amp;creativeASIN=B002IVDLGY" target="_blank">Wings of Desire</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=dissociatedpress-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B002IVDLGY&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399373" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> &#8211; astutely pointed out the similarity between the resulting murmur and the way the angels in <em>his</em> film had no choice but to hear the thoughts of humans everywhere, which created much of the lush sonic backdrop of Wings of Desire.  Schmerberg &#8211; Problema&#8217;s director &#8211; managed to capture much of this live feeling of the event by interspersing compelling, sometimes tear-inducing images with a lively mixture of both concise, eyes-at-the-camera answers, and almost out-take-like moments of verité in which the attendees fumbled with their thoughts or spoke in asides to the guests sitting next to them. The result is a thought-provoking documentary unlike any you&#8217;ve seen before. If you&#8217;re a caring person who lives in the so-called &#8220;First World&#8221;, a question like &#8220;Does our wealth depend on the Third World being poor?&#8221; might make you think &#8220;Well of course, and it&#8217;s a shameful tragedy&#8221;.  But you&#8217;ll suddenly be forced to ponder things like what a bogus concept the &#8220;Third World&#8221; is in the first place, or how much freedom you have if you live in a powerful western capitalist country, when a sophisticated, educated person from Colombia points out that he for instance is only able to visit a place like Berlin because of a four day visa connected with the making of the film. He otherwise is barred from our &#8220;first world&#8221; as a second-rate global citizen who &#8220;has no right to enter our paradise&#8221; as he puts it. Although you may find Problema quite watchable on your own, you might find it a lot more interesting if you watch it with some intelligent friends, so you can discuss the world of questions it is likely to raise in your heart and your head.  To view the film as a particapatory event, the Problema website offers a <a href="http://www.problema-thefilm.org/#/screenings" target="_blank">screening  page</a> that allows you to publicize the event, but you can just <a href="http://www.problema-thefilm.org/#/downloads" target="_blank">download it</a> and watch it with friends if you like &#8211; it&#8217;s free, provided in multiple file formats, and can be downloaded by bittorrent or as a direct file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/10/problema-the-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Am I Writing eBooks When I Don&#8217;t Even Own A Kindle?</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/10/why-am-i-writing-ebooks-when-i-dont-even-own-a-kindle/</link>
		<comments>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/10/why-am-i-writing-ebooks-when-i-dont-even-own-a-kindle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Popular Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=3300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The publishing world is going through a massive paradigm shift. Just in time to confuse the hell out of me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><span class="bodytextsm"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3301" style="border: 0pt none; margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px;" title="borders-225" src="http://dissociatedpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/borders-225.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="127" /><br />
This might have SOMETHING to do with it.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Me and eBooks go way back. Not quite as far back as the first time I used the wrong first-person pronoun on purpose, but at least back to about 1992, when I worked in one of the coolest bookstores ever: AfterWords, in Ann Arbor, Michigan. It was a store that mostly sold remainders, quality reprints, and small press stuff that was hard to find. One day while pricing a huge stack of  of the hardcover version of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/078688911X?tag=dissociatedpress-20" target="_blank">I&#8217;m Only One Man</a>, Regis Philbin&#8217;s biography, I casually mentioned something about how I&#8217;d just read in Wired magazine about the still-only-imagined eBook, and what a cool idea I thought it was. It took me a moment to notice the sudden silence around me. I looked up to find myself being stabbed through with a dagger-like look in the five eyes of my co-workers (one had just injured their eye and was wearing an eye-patch). The look in their eyes made it clear that they were collectively pondering the idea of paper-cutting me to death. &#8220;What, what, <em>WHAT</em>?&#8221;, I said. But I knew that it was just the book lover in them all that was causing this reaction. It was like suddenly I was the fireman from Ray Bradbury&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0001PIOX4?tag=dissociatedpress-20" target="_blank">Fahrenheit 451</a> and I was there to burn all their books. As much as I agreed with them about the feel and smell of a comforting bound book, they really just didn&#8217;t seem to care about the number of trees left in the world, the idea that you could carry every book you&#8217;ve ever owned in a notebook-size device, or the idea that it would never wear out, and could be highlighted repeatedly without devaluing it. Well, we&#8217;ve come a long way since then. So far that not only is AfterWords long-since defunct, but even the corporate monsters that destroyed them are dying. This has not impacted my reading habits a lot, in spite of the fact that I don&#8217;t own a Kindle or an iPad. Although I have to say the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0051VVOB2?tag=dissociatedpress-20" target="_blank">Kindle Fire</a> is very tempting, and who doesn&#8217;t want an iPad? Well, me, for the moment. But in any case, if I really want to read a particular book, I buy it or get it from the library. And far and away I do more short-form reading on the web. But this whole traditional book vs. eBook issue just became of critical importance to me. Why? Because I have a <a href="http://whyeveryoneshouldwaittablesfortwoweeks.com" target="_blank">more or less finished book</a> that I&#8217;m getting ready to peddle, and I just co-authored another book with a development partner. We&#8217;re developing a series of personal transformation products (we also maintain a sort of sandbox site called <a href="http://thewellnessaddict.com" target="_blank">TheWellnessAddict.com</a>) which will include a variety of books. So we submitted this first co-authored book to a publisher where my partner has been published before, and as we did so, <span id="more-3300"></span>we seriously researched all the new self-publishing options available. It&#8217;s a mind-numbing world of options out there, but we did our research. Which was a good thing; we pretty quickly got a very positive rejection notice. The book really just didn&#8217;t suit the publisher&#8217;s catalog, which we sort of knew already. So we&#8217;ve narrowed it down to a few choices. The obvious go-to distributors are <a href="http://www.createspace.com" target="_blank">CreateSpace</a> and <a href="http://www.lulu.com" target="_blank">Lulu</a>, but you find pretty quickly that once you realize you not only don&#8217;t have to spend months waiting around for rejection letters, but don&#8217;t have to live on the paltry royalties of the world&#8217;s publishing giants either, you get GREEDY. Both CreateSpace and Lulu take a hefty percentage, and it&#8217;s a balancing act between their distribution reach vs what you give up in profits. Plus, a lot of retail stores simply don&#8217;t stock self-published books. So we pretty quickly realized that since we&#8217;re authors without a publisher, hell, why not become publishers, too? Which opens up options like <a href="http://www.lightningsource.com" target="_blank">Lightning Source</a>. We haven&#8217;t made our final decision, but the question I asked at the top &#8211; Why Am I Writing eBooks? &#8211; has a pretty obvious answer once you start looking at ideas for marketing schemes. Although I was a <a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/07/why-i-wont-be-buying-chris-andersons-free-book">big fan of  the Free concept</a> a couple of years ago, I think that model has seen its day. But CHEAP will always be popular, and attention spans are getting shorter daily. I mean, I&#8217;m amazed you&#8217;re still reading this. This all means &#8211; since we&#8217;re not creating massive runs of books by two unheard of authors &#8211; that we can repackage these books in as many ways as we like. And sell them as cheaply as 99 cents if we like. And if that sounds like a vanity-paved road to poverty, just check out <a href="http://jakonrath.blogspot.com/2009/10/kindle-numbers-traditional-publishing.html" target="_blank">these numbers</a> shamelessly shared by author Joe Konrath of Chicago. The basic idea? He&#8217;s not the only author that has realized that the common breakdown is that if you sell less than 1,000 books at ten bucks, you&#8217;ll probably sell over 5,000 at two or three bucks. Plus, you&#8217;re getting more titles in more places and on more devices. Like that Kindle I don&#8217;t own. And this is becoming a huge market. Although Amazon won&#8217;t confirm that they&#8217;ve sold over 3 million Kindles, it was leaked that pre-orders for the Kindle Fire <a href="http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/kindle-fire-pre-orders-exceeding-2000-per-hour-2011104" target="_blank">were coming in at a rate of exceeding 2,000 per hour</a>. And Apple is <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/jacketcopy/2010/10/75-million-ipads-how-many-kindles.html" target="_blank">quite happy to let us know</a> that they&#8217;ve sold over 7 million iPads. That&#8217;s over 10 million customers needing content for their fun new device, and we think we have the perfect stuff. I mean, I can barely carry an idea for more than three sentences, let alone a 200 PAGE BOOK.  I&#8217;ll be following up with another piece soon, as we take the dive. If nothing else, maybe we&#8217;ll end up creating an insightful eBook about how to market eBooks. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dissociatedpress.com/2011/10/why-am-i-writing-ebooks-when-i-dont-even-own-a-kindle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
