<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pitchfork Media&#8217;s 50 Best Albums of 2009 ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/12/pitchfork-medias-50-best-albums-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/12/pitchfork-medias-50-best-albums-of-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 04:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Pitchfork Top 50 Albums of 2009 - With Torrents? - Dissociated Press</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/12/pitchfork-medias-50-best-albums-of-2009/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Pitchfork Top 50 Albums of 2009 - With Torrents? - Dissociated Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=1613#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>[...] came a little early for me this year; I was just complaining recently that Pitchfork&#8217;s annual staff picks of the the 50 best albums of the year wouldn&#8217;t be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came a little early for me this year; I was just complaining recently that Pitchfork&#8217;s annual staff picks of the the 50 best albums of the year wouldn&#8217;t be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
