<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Reading A Book Bad For The Environment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/09/is-reading-a-book-bad-for-the-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/09/is-reading-a-book-bad-for-the-environment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 04:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is The Printed Book Dead? at dissociatedpress.com</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/09/is-reading-a-book-bad-for-the-environment/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>Is The Printed Book Dead? at dissociatedpress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=1326#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>[...] book is imminent. Although as recently as September 2009 I was pondering the pros and cons of eBooks vs their dead tree counterparts, a few pieces of information finally tipped the scales for me recently, which was a relief, because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] book is imminent. Although as recently as September 2009 I was pondering the pros and cons of eBooks vs their dead tree counterparts, a few pieces of information finally tipped the scales for me recently, which was a relief, because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: July 27, 2010: My Annual Green Rant! Mailbag! &#171; Josephmallozzi&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/09/is-reading-a-book-bad-for-the-environment/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>July 27, 2010: My Annual Green Rant! Mailbag! &#171; Josephmallozzi&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=1326#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>[...] reading physical books (http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/09/is-reading-a-book-bad-for-the-environment/), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading physical books (<a href="http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/09/is-reading-a-book-bad-for-the-environment/" rel="nofollow">http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/09/is-reading-a-book-bad-for-the-environment/</a>), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Bright Green Environmentalism? - Dissociated Press</title>
		<link>http://dissociatedpress.com/2009/09/is-reading-a-book-bad-for-the-environment/#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Bright Green Environmentalism? - Dissociated Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissociatedpress.com/?p=1326#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>[...] because a lot of our choices have such far-reaching and difficult to trace consequences. The books vs. eBooks debate or drinking bottled water are classic examples. And then there&#8217;s that first question. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] because a lot of our choices have such far-reaching and difficult to trace consequences. The books vs. eBooks debate or drinking bottled water are classic examples. And then there&#8217;s that first question. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
